re: CVS commit: src/sys/dev/raidframe

2011-05-31 Thread matthew green
> Module Name: src > Committed By: yamt > Date: Fri May 27 22:48:25 UTC 2011 > > Modified Files: > src/sys/dev/raidframe: rf_driver.c > > Log Message: > don't forget to destroy mutex. thanks. .mrg.

Re: CVS commit: src/tests/kernel

2011-05-31 Thread Julio Merino
On 5/31/11 7:06 PM, Jukka Ruohonen wrote: On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 04:53:21PM +0100, Julio Merino wrote: One thing is reorganizing the tests to match the tree structure, but the other is to move the tests right next to the source I don't quite understand the latter part. Why is this a bad thing

Re: CVS commit: src/tests/kernel

2011-05-31 Thread Jukka Ruohonen
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 04:53:21PM +0100, Julio Merino wrote: > One thing is reorganizing the tests to match the tree structure, but the > other is to move the tests right next to the source I don't quite understand the latter part. Why is this a bad thing? I always thought that having a single u

Re: CVS commit: src

2011-05-31 Thread Jukka Ruohonen
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 06:07:12PM +, S.P.Zeidler wrote: > - introduce a limit for the routes accepted via IPv6 Router Advertisement: > a common 2 interface client will have 6, the default limit is 100 and > can be adjusted via sysctl As usual, can we have these noted in sysctl(7)? - Jukk