On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 10:34:05AM +0200, Marc Balmer wrote:
> What is the current state of C99 vs. older Cs? Do all arches /
> compilers we have support C99?
We have lost the playstation2 port, because we don't have a working C99
compiler for it (so a -current kernel can not be compiled).
Marti
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 04:45:07PM +, David Holland wrote:
> On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 12:07:20PM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> > If we are going to be compiling the kernel in c99 mode, then I
> > suggest that we do the same for userland instead of turning it on
> > for userland piecemeal.
>
14.05.2011, 10:38, "Masao Uebayashi" :
> I disagree. If variables are declared in the middle of context, those
> variables have narrower contexts. Narrowing context is always a win
> IMO.
That's true only if you don't use gotos. Otherwise, you might jump past
an initialization point with obvious
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 12:07:20PM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> If we are going to be compiling the kernel in c99 mode, then I
> suggest that we do the same for userland instead of turning it on
> for userland piecemeal.
+1
is there anything we expect to break?
--
David A. Holland
dholl..
On 5/14/11 12:31 PM, Christos Zoulas wrote:
On May 14, 12:29pm, j...@julipedia.org (Julio Merino) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/sys/crypto/rijndael
|> Declare for-loop control variable outside of the for statement to prevent
|> a warning and therefore fix the build.
|
| Ah! I just sa
On May 14, 12:29pm, j...@julipedia.org (Julio Merino) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/sys/crypto/rijndael
| > Declare for-loop control variable outside of the for statement to prevent
| > a warning and therefore fix the build.
|
| Ah! I just saw your warns=4 change. I presume my 'fix' go
On 5/14/11 12:27 PM, Julio Merino wrote:
Module Name:src
Committed By: jmmv
Date: Sat May 14 16:27:50 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
src/sys/crypto/rijndael: rijndael-api-fst.c
Log Message:
Declare for-loop control variable outside of the for statement to prevent
a warning and
On May 14, 1:02pm, hann...@eis.cs.tu-bs.de
(=?iso-8859-1?Q?J=FCrgen_Hannken-Illjes?=) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/sys/crypto/rijndael
| This breaks in src/regress/sys/crypto/rijndael:
|
| # compile rijndael/rijndael-api-fst.o
| 486--netbsdelf-gcc -O2 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmi
On May 14, 12:00pm, rm...@netbsd.org (Mindaugas Rasiukevicius) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/sys/fs/tmpfs
| Benefit is code readability. It is easier to track the variables when
| they are defined and initialised in the beginning of context.
|
| If code is longer and/or complex - it lik
On May 14, 2011, at 3:59 AM, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: christos
> Date: Sat May 14 01:59:19 UTC 2011
>
> Modified Files:
> src/sys/crypto/rijndael: rijndael-api-fst.c
>
> Log Message:
> - don't assume aligned buffers.
> - little KNF
>
>
> To gene
Masao Uebayashi wrote:
> >> The kernel explicitly allows C99 and actually C99 is encouraged.
> >> So that should reverted :)
> >
> > Generally - C99 is encouraged. However, I disagree that variables
> > should be declared in the middle of context (for a minimum scope),
> > unless there is a *clea
On Sat, 14 May 2011, Marc Balmer wrote:
> What is the current state of C99 vs. older Cs? Do all arches /
> compilers we have support C99? I assume gcc, llvm/clang are safe, but
> what about pcc wrt C99?
>
> I'd like a short clarification here, since this might influence my
> coding... tnx.
pcc
Am 14.05.11 10:45, schrieb Anders Magnusson:
[...]
>> What is the current state of C99 vs. older Cs? Do all arches /
>> compilers we have support C99? I assume gcc, llvm/clang are safe, but
>> what about pcc wrt C99?
> pcc should be C99 compliant. If something do not work as expected, I'll
> fix
On 05/14/2011 10:34 AM, Marc Balmer wrote:
Am 10.05.11 02:34, schrieb Matt Thomas:
Module Name:src
Committed By: matt
Date: Tue May 10 00:34:26 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
src/sys/fs/tmpfs: tmpfs_vnops.c
Log Message:
yes, more C99 please (back out previous change).
After
Am 10.05.11 02:34, schrieb Matt Thomas:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: matt
> Date: Tue May 10 00:34:26 UTC 2011
>
> Modified Files:
> src/sys/fs/tmpfs: tmpfs_vnops.c
>
> Log Message:
> yes, more C99 please (back out previous change).
After this committ/back-out/back-out-pf-th
15 matches
Mail list logo
