On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 02:05:01AM +, David Holland wrote:
>> I think for the rest I'm going to revert and then redo them.
>
> Because that would get me into rcsid hell, I decided not. I've fixed
> the repo and will reply with the right message for the archive.
...which messages have not
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 02:21:17AM +, David A. Holland wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By:dholland
> Date:Mon Apr 11 02:21:17 UTC 2011
>
> Modified Files:
> src/sys/kern: vfs_lookup.c
>
> Log Message:
> description:
> Update comments.
...aaand tha
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 01:35:00AM +, David A. Holland wrote:
> Log Message:
> ZZmsg
>
>
> To generate a diff of this commit:
> cvs rdiff -u -r1.133 -r1.134 src/sys/kern/vfs_lookup.c
More cleanup.
--
David A. Holland
dholl...@netbsd.org
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 01:53:32AM +, David Holland wrote:
> I think for the rest I'm going to revert and then redo them.
Because that would get me into rcsid hell, I decided not. I've fixed
the repo and will reply with the right message for the archive.
Sigh. at least phone stopped me befor
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 01:33:05AM +, David A. Holland wrote:
> Modified Files:
> src/sys/kern: vfs_lookup.c
> src/sys/nfs: nfs_serv.c nfs_srvsubs.c
>
> Log Message:
> kern/ZZmsg
This was supposed to be:
Clean up. Move some more code across from nfsd's private entry points
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 01:33:05AM +, David A. Holland wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By:dholland
> Date:Mon Apr 11 01:33:05 UTC 2011
>
> Modified Files:
> src/sys/kern: vfs_lookup.c
> src/sys/nfs: nfs_serv.c nfs_srvsubs.c
>
> Log Message:
>
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 11:25:50PM +0200, Christoph Egger wrote:
> > [...] ${[...foo...] :? --sysroot=${DESTDIR} :}
^ ^
> :? == ?: operator?
no, see above.
--
David A. Holland
dholl...@netbsd.org
On 10.04.11 23:03, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: joerg
> Date: Sun Apr 10 21:03:17 UTC 2011
>
> Modified Files:
> src/share/mk: bsd.own.mk
>
> Log Message:
> Use ?: operator to determine when to add --sysroot. Unbreaks clang
> bootstrap.
>
[...]
>
In article <20110410161417.ge4...@nef.pbox.org>,
Alistair Crooks wrote:
>hi christos,
>
>On Sat, Apr 09, 2011 at 04:53:39PM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote:
>> - use struct copy instead of memcpy
>
>i haven't looked into this specific instance, but won't gcc (at least)
>produce the same code for mem
hi christos,
On Sat, Apr 09, 2011 at 04:53:39PM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> - use struct copy instead of memcpy
i haven't looked into this specific instance, but won't gcc (at least)
produce the same code for memcpy as struct copy, and the memcpy call
has the (admittedly arguable) distinction
They should be removed - if you use "cvs update -Pd"
On Sun, 10 Apr 2011, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
On Sat, Apr 09, 2011 at 05:45:25PM +, Paul Goyette wrote:
Module Name:src
Committed By: pgoyette
Date: Sat Apr 9 17:45:25 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
src/distrib/sets/list
11 matches
Mail list logo
