On Feb 8, 2011, at 3:33 PM, Adam Hamsik wrote:
>
> On Feb,Tuesday 8 2011, at 10:56 PM, Cliff Neighbors wrote:
>
>> Module Name: src
>> Committed By:cliff
>> Date:Tue Feb 8 21:56:02 UTC 2011
>>
>> Modified Files:
>> src/sys/kern [matt-nb5-mips64]: subr_autoconf.c
>
In article <20110208212244.gk22...@cs.hut.fi>,
Antti Kantee wrote:
>On Tue Feb 08 2011 at 22:00:49 +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 03:34:54PM -0500, Christos Zoulas wrote:
>> > Still the problem remains, how do we stack the calls to insert the ssp
>> > check at the top
In article <20110208220435.ga10...@britannica.bec.de>,
Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
>On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 11:43:40PM +0200, Antti Kantee wrote:
>> On Tue Feb 08 2011 at 22:41:57 +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
>> > On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 11:22:44PM +0200, Antti Kantee wrote:
>> > > On Tue Feb 0
In article <20110208210049.ga8...@britannica.bec.de>,
Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
>On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 03:34:54PM -0500, Christos Zoulas wrote:
>> Still the problem remains, how do we stack the calls to insert the ssp
>> check at the top level, without resorting to rtld tricks?
>
>Let me try to
On Feb,Tuesday 8 2011, at 10:56 PM, Cliff Neighbors wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: cliff
> Date: Tue Feb 8 21:56:02 UTC 2011
>
> Modified Files:
> src/sys/kern [matt-nb5-mips64]: subr_autoconf.c
>
> Log Message:
> use mutex_obj_alloc() to allocate config_queues_lock a
On 2/8/11 1:29 PM, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
Module Name:src
Committed By: bouyer
Date: Tue Feb 8 21:29:46 UTC 2011
Modified Files:
src/sys/ufs/ffs [bouyer-quota2]: ffs_subr.c
Log Message:
for !_KERNEL case, always define FFS_EI.
Required for makefs, and maybe resize_ffs (it
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 11:43:40PM +0200, Antti Kantee wrote:
> On Tue Feb 08 2011 at 22:41:57 +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 11:22:44PM +0200, Antti Kantee wrote:
> > > On Tue Feb 08 2011 at 22:00:49 +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 03:
On Tue Feb 08 2011 at 23:04:35 +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > > > No, it wants to override "whatever is the symbol applications are
> > > > resolved to". For -current this is "_sys_read" (on nb5 it's "read").
> > >
> > > That's not what the library is doing according to nm. It defines "read
On Tue Feb 08 2011 at 22:41:57 +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 11:22:44PM +0200, Antti Kantee wrote:
> > On Tue Feb 08 2011 at 22:00:49 +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 03:34:54PM -0500, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> > > > Still the problem remain
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 11:22:44PM +0200, Antti Kantee wrote:
> On Tue Feb 08 2011 at 22:00:49 +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 03:34:54PM -0500, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> > > Still the problem remains, how do we stack the calls to insert the ssp
> > > check at the top le
On Tue Feb 08 2011 at 23:22:44 +0200, Antti Kantee wrote:
> On Tue Feb 08 2011 at 22:00:49 +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 03:34:54PM -0500, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> > > Still the problem remains, how do we stack the calls to insert the ssp
> > > check at the top level,
On Tue Feb 08 2011 at 22:00:49 +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 03:34:54PM -0500, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> > Still the problem remains, how do we stack the calls to insert the ssp
> > check at the top level, without resorting to rtld tricks?
>
> Let me try to summarize th
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 03:34:54PM -0500, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> Still the problem remains, how do we stack the calls to insert the ssp
> check at the top level, without resorting to rtld tricks?
Let me try to summarize the situation to make sure I get it right:
The fortification code wants to
On Feb 8, 10:30pm, po...@cs.hut.fi (Antti Kantee) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/lib/librumphijack
| On Tue Feb 08 2011 at 15:03:11 -0500, Christos Zoulas wrote:
| > [explanation]
| >
| > In your c code then in hijack.c you need to define the body of _hijack_read.
| > You also end up need
On Tue Feb 08 2011 at 15:03:11 -0500, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> [explanation]
>
> In your c code then in hijack.c you need to define the body of _hijack_read.
> You also end up needing to define the bodies of readlink and getcwd, but
> that is easily done...
>
> I hope that helps. The trick to und
On Feb 8, 5:01pm, po...@cs.hut.fi (Antti Kantee) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/lib/librumphijack
| On Tue Feb 08 2011 at 05:15:39 +, Christos Zoulas wrote:
| > In article <20110207124333.gg15...@cs.hut.fi>,
| > Antti Kantee wrote:
| > >On Mon Feb 07 2011 at 11:51:02 +, Antti Ka
On Tue Feb 08 2011 at 05:15:39 +, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> In article <20110207124333.gg15...@cs.hut.fi>,
> Antti Kantee wrote:
> >On Mon Feb 07 2011 at 11:51:02 +, Antti Kantee wrote:
> >> Module Name: src
> >> Committed By: pooka
> >> Date: Mon Feb 7 11:51:02 UT
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Paul Goyette wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: pgoyette
> Date: Tue Feb 8 13:58:54 UTC 2011
>
> Modified Files:
> src/sbin/dmctl: dmctl.c
>
> Log Message:
> Use PRIu64 to fix build on amd64 (and presumably other 64-bit ports)
Thanks !
18 matches
Mail list logo
