On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 11:34:23AM +1100, Simon Burge wrote:
> Why was this removed when there was an active discussion about removing
> it where no concensus was reached? This sort of thing where commis
> occur before a discussion is finished seems to be occurring more and
> more often.
Maybe be
"Jukka Ruohonen" wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: jruoho
> Date: Mon Jan 17 11:09:08 UTC 2011
>
> Modified Files:
>
> src/distrib/sets/lists/comp: mi
> src/share/misc: Makefile
> Removed Files:
>
> src/share/misc: operator
>
> Log Message:
>
> Remove /usr/s
On Sunday 16 January 2011 12:38:28 Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: bouyer
> Date: Sun Jan 16 12:38:28 UTC 2011
>
> Modified Files:
> src/sbin/fsck_ext2fs [netbsd-5]: inode.c setup.c
> src/sbin/newfs_ext2fs [netbsd-5]: mke2fs.c newfs_ext2fs.8
>
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 05:11:13AM +, David Holland wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 07:30:00PM +, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > Modified Files:
> >src/share/mk: sys.mk
> >
> > Log Message:
> > Alpha doesn't need -traditional-cpp for assembler.
>
> Shouldn't that logic be in bsd.
