Re: CVS commit: src/sys/arch

2011-01-02 Thread Michael
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, On Jan 2, 2011, at 2:11 PM, Adam Hamsik wrote: On Jan,Sunday 2 2011, at 7:39 PM, Izumi Tsutsui wrote: Module Name:src Committed By: tsutsui Date: Sun Jan 2 18:39:11 UTC 2011 Modified Files: src/sys/arch/cesfic/ce

Re: CVS commit: src/sys/arch

2011-01-02 Thread Izumi Tsutsui
> > Compile test only. (any working machine for these port?) > > What is point of keeping these files in tree ? > If we can't even test netbsd on them. > Can we please move those archs to Attic ? I have no idea. (though I could test luna68k once I have working one) Please ask portmasters or Core

Re: CVS commit: src/sys/arch

2011-01-02 Thread Adam Hamsik
On Jan,Sunday 2 2011, at 7:39 PM, Izumi Tsutsui wrote: > Module Name: src > Committed By: tsutsui > Date: Sun Jan 2 18:39:11 UTC 2011 > > Modified Files: > src/sys/arch/cesfic/cesfic: pmap_bootstrap.c > src/sys/arch/luna68k/luna68k: pmap_bootstrap.c > > Log Message: > Pull

Re: CVS commit: src/external/mit/xorg/server/drivers

2011-01-02 Thread Izumi Tsutsui
> Modified Files: > src/external/mit/xorg/server/drivers: Makefile > > Log Message: > fix a comment Hmm, it's also better to sort by ${MACHINE} name. --- Izumi Tsutsui

Re: CVS commit: src

2011-01-02 Thread Antti Kantee
On Sun Jan 02 2011 at 12:58:13 +0200, Antti Kantee wrote: > If componentname is guaranteed to be "opaque" (i.e. no "read only" might have been a better term there. (airquotes because of at least cn_consume) -- älä karot toivorikkauttas, kyl rätei ja lumpui piisaa

Re: CVS commit: src

2011-01-02 Thread Antti Kantee
On Sun Jan 02 2011 at 05:04:59 +, David A. Holland wrote: > Module Name: src > Committed By: dholland > Date: Sun Jan 2 05:04:59 UTC 2011 > > Modified Files: > src/lib/libp2k: p2k.c > src/sys/kern: vfs_lookup.c > src/sys/sys: namei.src > > Log Message: > Add an INR

Re: CVS commit: src/tests/fs/common

2011-01-02 Thread David Laight
On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 05:26:29AM +, David Holland wrote: > On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 05:22:32AM +, David Holland wrote: > > It would also be worthwhile to test that nfsd doesn't allow writing > > via read-only handles, but that's a different issue and will require a > > different test fr