On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 03:32:44AM +, Masao Uebayashi wrote:
> XXX What is the conclusion about direct vs. indirect #include from headers?
Every header file should include the things it requires to compile.
Therefore, there should in principle be no cases where a header file
(or source file)
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 06:16:33AM -0800, Paul Goyette wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Nov 2010, Masao Uebayashi wrote:
>
> >Module Name: src
> >Committed By:uebayasi
> >Date:Sat Nov 13 14:08:20 UTC 2010
> >
> >Modified Files:
> > src/sys/dev/dmover: dmover_io.c
> >
> >Log Message:
On Sat, 13 Nov 2010, Masao Uebayashi wrote:
Module Name:src
Committed By: uebayasi
Date: Sat Nov 13 14:08:20 UTC 2010
Modified Files:
src/sys/dev/dmover: dmover_io.c
Log Message:
dmover(4) really uses uvm(9). (Wasn't revealed by i386/ALL...)
Shouldn't we update i386/
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 08:41:41AM +, Masao Uebayashi wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: uebayasi
> Date: Sat Nov 13 08:41:41 UTC 2010
>
> Modified Files:
> src/sys/sys: param.h
>
> Log Message:
> Include uvm/uvm_param.h from here to provide PAGE_SIZE and other
> VM rela
