> > BTW, I wondered what was the official name of this
> > when I maintained src/doc/CHANGES...
> >
> > - src/sys/modules
> > - options MODULAR
> > - module(9)
>
> Since all of the public API routines are named module_xxx() I figured
> that that was the best name for the subsystem.
Hmm, then mod
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010, Izumi Tsutsui wrote:
Log Message:
Make a first pass at documenting the module(9) subsystem.
BTW, I wondered what was the official name of this
when I maintained src/doc/CHANGES...
- src/sys/modules
- options MODULAR
- module(9)
Since all of the public API routines are n
> Log Message:
> Make a first pass at documenting the module(9) subsystem.
BTW, I wondered what was the official name of this
when I maintained src/doc/CHANGES...
- src/sys/modules
- options MODULAR
- module(9)
---
Izumi Tsutsui
In article <20100730072156.ga20...@marx.bitnet>,
Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 08:59:33PM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote:
>> 1. ACPI seems to define cpuids 1..n; we define 0..n-1. Adjust for that
>> 2. My laptop is dual core, but ACPI reports 4 cpu nodes. Instead of
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 08:59:33PM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> 1. ACPI seems to define cpuids 1..n; we define 0..n-1. Adjust for that
> 2. My laptop is dual core, but ACPI reports 4 cpu nodes. Instead of
>attaching the unmatched ones, make the match fail. Do we want to
>attach and do no
