Re: CVS commit: src/tools/compat/sys

2010-03-26 Thread Christos Zoulas
In article <1933.1269630...@splode.eterna.com.au>, matthew green wrote: > > > tools/ctfconvert/../../external/cddl/osnet/sys/sys/time.h:71: error: > 'CLOCK_REALTIME' undeclared (first use in this function) > > > >shouldn't this be fixed with something in nbtool_config.h? Just back t

Re: CVS commit: src/tools/compat/sys

2010-03-26 Thread Matt Thomas
On Mar 26, 2010, at 12:00 PM, matthew green wrote: > > > tools/ctfconvert/../../external/cddl/osnet/sys/sys/time.h:71: error: > 'CLOCK_REALTIME' undeclared (first use in this function) > > > > shouldn't this be fixed with something in nbtool_config.h? That's what I was thinking sinc

re: CVS commit: src/tools/compat/sys

2010-03-26 Thread matthew green
tools/ctfconvert/../../external/cddl/osnet/sys/sys/time.h:71: error: 'CLOCK_REALTIME' undeclared (first use in this function) shouldn't this be fixed with something in nbtool_config.h?

Re: acpiec bus tag (was Re: CVS commit: src/sys/dev)

2010-03-26 Thread Jukka Ruohonen
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 12:50:38PM -0500, David Young wrote: > It used to be definitely incorrect. So we're making progress. Do you > have any idea how to make it definitely correct? Sorry: I misread the patch originally. It should not affect the functionality. The NULL pointer dereference is a

acpiecdt bus tag (was Re: CVS commit: src/sys/dev)

2010-03-26 Thread David Young
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 07:00:15AM +0200, Jukka Ruohonen wrote: > On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 01:13:30AM +, David Young wrote: > > Module Name:src > > Committed By: dyoung > > Date: Wed Mar 24 01:13:30 UTC 2010 > > > > Modified Files: > > src/sys/dev/acpi: acpi_ec.c

acpiec bus tag (was Re: CVS commit: src/sys/dev)

2010-03-26 Thread David Young
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 07:26:01AM +0200, Jukka Ruohonen wrote: > On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 01:13:30AM +, David Young wrote: > > Module Name:src > > Committed By: dyoung > > Date: Wed Mar 24 01:13:30 UTC 2010 > > > > Modified Files: > > src/sys/dev/acpi: acpi_ec.c

Re: CVS commit: src/tools/compat/sys

2010-03-26 Thread Christoph Egger
Original-Nachricht > Datum: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 03:03:06 +1100 > Von: matthew green > An: "Christoph Egger" > CC: source-changes-d@NetBSD.org > Betreff: re: CVS commit: src/tools/compat/sys > > >>toolchain buildfix on OSX with MKDTRACE=yes: >> >>The h

Re: CVS commit: src

2010-03-26 Thread Greg A. Woods
At Sat, 27 Mar 2010 02:38:01 +1100, matthew green wrote: Subject: re: CVS commit: src > > >On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 16:57:16 + >Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote: > >> David Holland wrote: >> > > What Joerg said. They are low level kernel implementation details. >> > > Th

re: CVS commit: src/tools/compat/sys

2010-03-26 Thread matthew green
>toolchain buildfix on OSX with MKDTRACE=yes: > >The host doesn't provide CLOCK_REALTIME but >ctf uses it. >See http://mail-index.netbsd.org/current-users/2010/03/20/msg012963.html > > this seems bogus to me. > > please only define it if it isn

Re: re: CVS commit: src/tools/compat/sys

2010-03-26 Thread Christoph Egger
> >Module Name: src >Committed By: cegger >Date: Fri Mar 26 07:16:12 UTC 2010 > >Added Files: > src/tools/compat/sys: time.h > >Log Message: >toolchain buildfix on OSX with MKDTRACE=yes: > >The host doesn't provide CLOCK_REALT

re: CVS commit: src

2010-03-26 Thread matthew green
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 16:57:16 + Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote: > David Holland wrote: > > > What Joerg said. They are low level kernel implementation details. > > > These belong in a book or article or a wiki page or something, not the > > > manual. > > > > We

re: CVS commit: src/tools/compat/sys

2010-03-26 Thread matthew green
Module Name: src Committed By:cegger Date:Fri Mar 26 07:16:12 UTC 2010 Added Files: src/tools/compat/sys: time.h Log Message: toolchain buildfix on OSX with MKDTRACE=yes: The host doesn't provide CLOCK_REALTIME but ctf uses it. S

Re: CVS commit: src

2010-03-26 Thread Adam Hoka
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 16:57:16 + Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote: > David Holland wrote: > > > What Joerg said. They are low level kernel implementation details. > > > These belong in a book or article or a wiki page or something, not the > > > manual. > > > > We just went around on this li