On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 03:41:07PM +1100, matthew green wrote:
>
>SPLDEBUG is single-purpose. It also has some bugs, which I am happy to
>describe. But let's keep it until we come up with something better.
>
>
> now you've told me all of: it's single purpose, MD, and doesn't work.
SPLDEBUG is single-purpose. It also has some bugs, which I am happy to
describe. But let's keep it until we come up with something better.
now you've told me all of: it's single purpose, MD, and doesn't work.
please revert SPLDEBUG. it does not belong in sys/kern.
.mrg.
David Young wrote:
> > In fact, I am not convinced that such IPL tracking is very useful - we
> > have reduced amount of IPLs, which is much simpler model than we used to
> > have, and the problem you were recently debugging was miss-interpretation
> > of certain spin-mutex behaviour.
>
> You hav
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 03:36:36AM +, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote:
> In fact, I am not convinced that such IPL tracking is very useful - we have
> reduced amount of IPLs, which is much simpler model than we used to have, and
> the problem you were recently debugging was miss-interpretation of
Roy Marples wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: roy
> Date: Fri Nov 20 13:42:43 UTC 2009
>
> Modified Files:
> src/sys/miscfs/genfs: genfs_vnops.c
>
> Log Message:
> Allow chown if caller is in the new group.
Is it possible now to do something like
chown me:users /etc/passw
