On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 06:34:47PM +0200, Marc Balmer wrote:
> Am 27.07.2009 um 18:08 schrieb Matthias Drochner:
>
> >
> >lacom...@gmail.com said:
> >>Am I the only one to find that attaching a pseudo-device in main() is
> >>not the right way to go ?
> >
> >No. This looks like a case for "defpseu
Arnaud Lacombe writes:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
>> And in addition to being less than 24 hours old, the code was his own
>> code. The clear de facto rule is that you can change code you wrote and
>> own with a lot less approval, even for a new developer, than oth
m.droch...@fz-juelich.de said:
> In that function, you can call config_attach_pseudo(9) to attach
> the actual instances. See eg sys/dev/vnd.c for an example.
Forgot to mention that you need to call
config_cfattach_attach()
before. sys/dev/md.c is a better example.
best regards
Matthias
---
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 2:01 PM, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> Eh, if we make it too hard to commit to code under active development,
> people won't actively develop. Marc has also shown that he's willing to
> make reasonable changes when improvements are pointed out to him.
>
That's why I _just_ put m
Hi Perry,
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> And in addition to being less than 24 hours old, the code was his own
> code. The clear de facto rule is that you can change code you wrote and
> own with a lot less approval, even for a new developer, than other stuff
> requires
Arnaud Lacombe writes:
> On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 5:26 PM, matthew green wrote:
>> incidentially, i actually did object to this change on ICB last night
>> but i was off to bed and didn't feel like arguing at the time. i
>> didn't expect to see it commited straight away. so marc's claim that
>>
Am 27.07.2009 um 18:57 schrieb Matthias Drochner:
m...@msys.ch said:
yes, please mail me some hints, I find it gross myself, but did not
yet find a better way.
It is pretty easy:
-in files.gpio, change the declaration to
defpseudodev gpiosim: gpiobus
and remove the "attach" line
-in the ker
lacom...@gmail.com said:
> config(9) doesn't seem to know anything about 'defpseudodev'
config(5) mentions it. (I've written that part. It anyone has
suggestions for better wording please tell me.)
best regards
Matthias
-
m...@msys.ch said:
> yes, please mail me some hints, I find it gross myself, but did not
> yet find a better way.
It is pretty easy:
-in files.gpio, change the declaration to
defpseudodev gpiosim: gpiobus
and remove the "attach" line
-in the kernel config, change "gpiosim0 at root" (or what you
Am 27.07.2009 um 18:36 schrieb Matthias Drochner:
lacom...@gmail.com said:
config(9) doesn't seem to know anything about 'defpseudodev'
config(5) mentions it. (I've written that part. It anyone has
suggestions for better wording please tell me.)
I'll take care of this issue. If there is
Am 27.07.2009 um 18:08 schrieb Matthias Drochner:
lacom...@gmail.com said:
Am I the only one to find that attaching a pseudo-device in main() is
not the right way to go ?
No. This looks like a case for "defpseudodev". You'll find a couple
of examples in the tree. (Or I can help if necessary
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Matthias
Drochner wrote:
> lacom...@gmail.com said:
>> Am I the only one to find that attaching a pseudo-device in main() is
>> not the right way to go ?
>
> No. This looks like a case for "defpseudodev". You'll find a couple
> of examples in the tree. (Or I can he
lacom...@gmail.com said:
> Am I the only one to find that attaching a pseudo-device in main() is
> not the right way to go ?
No. This looks like a case for "defpseudodev". You'll find a couple
of examples in the tree. (Or I can help if necessary.)
best regards
Matthias
---
Hi all,
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Marc Balmer wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: mbalmer
> Date: Sat Jul 25 16:23:39 UTC 2009
>
> Modified Files:
> src/sys/kern: init_main.c
>
> Log Message:
> Allow gpiosim(4) to attach if configured in the kernel configuration
Hi! Tom,
From: Tom Spindler
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 07:54:53 -0700
> Is this missing a change to files.pci? pgoyette et al say this occurs:
>
> /src/src/sys/arch/i386/conf/GENERIC:801: `mvsata' cannot attach to `pci'
Fixed ;-)
--
kiyohara
Is this missing a change to files.pci? pgoyette et al say this occurs:
/src/src/sys/arch/i386/conf/GENERIC:801: `mvsata' cannot attach to `pci'
16 matches
Mail list logo
