thanks!
YAMAMOTO Takashi
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: he
> Date: Wed Jun 10 11:41:44 UTC 2009
>
> Modified Files:
> src/sys/rump/librump/rumpkern: vm.c
>
> Log Message:
> Add a dummy uvm_readahead() function, to fix build issues after it
> recently got added to the kernel.
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 12:51:58PM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 10:57:16PM +, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
> > do you have any idea what an implementation of POSIX_FADV_NOREUSE
> > which is not a no-op would be like?
>
> Effectively add the page is if has been aged alr
On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 10:57:16PM +, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
> i want to implement them if useful.
awesome.
> do you have any idea what an implementation of POSIX_FADV_NOREUSE
> which is not a no-op would be like?
My suggestion would be to not count this hit amongst the statistics
collected
On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 10:57:16PM +, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
> do you have any idea what an implementation of POSIX_FADV_NOREUSE
> which is not a no-op would be like?
Effectively add the page is if has been aged already?
> IMO, the use-once stream is a too common workload to require
> an exp