David Holland wrote:
> On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 12:48:31PM +, Christoph Egger wrote:
> > Module Name: src
> > Committed By: cegger
> > Date: Tue May 5 12:48:31 UTC 2009
> >
> > Modified Files:
> >src/sys/nfs: nfs_bootdhcp.c
> >
> > Log Message:
> > buildfi
Module Name: src
Committed By:cube
Date:Wed May 6 02:52:13 UTC 2009
Modified Files:
src/sys/conf: files
Log Message:
Bump required config(1) version after files.drm changes [hi mrg!].
so, this is because i'm using the new feature you add
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 11:38:36PM +, David Holland wrote:
> Having things fail silently or go into a fugue state is not an
> improvement, particularly in security code. So I'd qualify all this by
> saying that end-to-end behavior should always be fail-stop.
Since this is apparently not tha
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 09:03:29PM +, Elad Efrat wrote:
> Log Message:
> Add device scope actions for rnd(4) and use them.
I didn't have a chance to look over these in time, but thankyou, this
is a welcome direction.
--
Dan.
pgpjoXkdwkTQS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 12:33:00AM +0100, Alistair Crooks wrote:
> Imagine someone embedding this library in their (embedded) product.
> Having the library dump core for what is an unusual ocurrence, admittedly
> (such as an out of memory condition, perhaps) is suboptimal, since the
> product m
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 11:52:09AM -0400, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
>
> "Alistair G. Crooks" writes:
> > + get rid of some assertions in the code - this is a library - about 100 to
> > go
>
> Why does the fact that it is a library make assertions a bad thing,
> especially in security code?
It do
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 12:48:31PM +, Christoph Egger wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By:cegger
> Date:Tue May 5 12:48:31 UTC 2009
>
> Modified Files:
> src/sys/nfs: nfs_bootdhcp.c
>
> Log Message:
> buildfix: use %d for BOOTP_SIZE_(MIN,MAX).
> Ma
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 09:20:02PM +, Andrew Doran wrote:
> > but the test binary from the PR segfaults:
> > truc# kdump |less
> >
> > 34 0 ktrace EMUL "netbsd"
> > 34 0 ktrace RET ktrace 0
> > 34 0 ktrace CA
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 09:20:02PM +, Andrew Doran wrote:
> > I tried the following code instead:
> > IDTVEC(osyscall)
> > CLI(%eax) # must be first instruction
> > pushfl # set eflags in trap frame
> > popl8(%esp)
> > orl $PSL_I,(%esp)
On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 03:41:16PM +0200, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 11:47:29AM +, Andrew Doran wrote:
> > Module Name:src
> > Committed By: ad
> > Date: Mon May 4 11:47:29 UTC 2009
> >
> > Modified Files:
> > src/sys/arch/i386/i386: locore
Hi Manuel,
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 08:26:37PM +, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: bouyer
> Date: Tue May 5 20:26:36 UTC 2009
>
> Modified Files:
> src/sys/kern: kern_softint.c
>
> Log Message:
> Declare sh_flags volatile.
> Without it, on ports where s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
On May 5, 2009, at 4:26 PM, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
Module Name:src
Committed By: bouyer
Date: Tue May 5 20:26:36 UTC 2009
Modified Files:
src/sys/kern: kern_softint.c
Log Message:
Declare sh_flags volatile.
Without i
"Alistair G. Crooks" writes:
> + get rid of some assertions in the code - this is a library - about 100 to go
Why does the fact that it is a library make assertions a bad thing,
especially in security code?
Perry
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 10:21:23AM +, Christoph Egger wrote:
> Module Name: src
> Committed By: cegger
> Date: Tue May 5 10:21:23 UTC 2009
>
> Modified Files:
> src/sys/dev/pci: if_bnx.c
>
> Log Message:
> Attach on BCM5709 chip.
> XXX Firmware fails to complete initialization
14 matches
Mail list logo
