Re: CVS commit: src

2009-04-15 Thread Perry E. Metzger
Joerg Sonnenberger writes: > Module Name: src > Committed By: joerg > Date: Wed Apr 15 22:36:05 UTC 2009 > > Modified Files: > src/etc/rc.d: Makefile > Added Files: > src/sbin/rcorder: rcorder-visualize.sh > > Log Message: > Add a small script to visualize the rc dependency g

Re: CVS commit: src/usr.bin/patch

2009-04-15 Thread Tobias Nygren
On Mon, 13 Apr 2009 00:07:26 + Luke Mewburn wrote: > Modified Files: > src/usr.bin/patch: inp.c > > Log Message: > Fix sign-compare issue > > To generate a diff of this commit: > cvs rdiff -u -r1.19 -r1.20 src/usr.bin/patch/inp.c What about platforms where off_t is too small to hold

Re: CVS commit: src/sys/fs/tmpfs

2009-04-15 Thread David Holland
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 10:36:38PM +, Andrew Doran wrote: > > Might be. I filed a PR for that ages ago and had forgotten all about > > it by now. See kern/38188. > > On the face of it what do you think of: > > - preserve pnbuf across entirety of operations that use it > - retire SAVE

Re: CVS commit: src/sys/fs/tmpfs

2009-04-15 Thread Antti Kantee
On Fri Apr 10 2009 at 22:36:38 +, Andrew Doran wrote: > On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 01:32:09AM +0300, Antti Kantee wrote: > > > On Fri Apr 10 2009 at 21:34:10 +, Andrew Doran wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 06:57:45PM +0200, Frank Kardel wrote: > > > > > > > It may be related: I am now s

Re: CVS commit: src/sys/fs/tmpfs

2009-04-15 Thread Antti Kantee
On Wed Apr 15 2009 at 11:41:26 +, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote: > Module Name: src > Committed By: yamt > Date: Wed Apr 15 11:41:26 UTC 2009 > > Modified Files: > src/sys/fs/tmpfs: tmpfs_vnops.c > > Log Message: > plug some pnbuf leaks. Shouldn't that, theoretically, check for SAVES

Re: CVS commit: src/crypto/dist/openssl/apps

2009-04-15 Thread David Holland
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 09:11:01AM +0700, Robert Elz wrote: > | The ctype functions are often implemented as #defines that index arrays, > | so if the argument is 'char' it is very likely to index off the front > | which leads to an unexpected result or core dump. > > Yes, the "undefine