Re: YAML update request handler

2008-02-22 Thread Noble Paul നോബിള്‍ नोब्ळ्
;>> The format over the wire is not of great significance because it > >>>> gets > >>>> unmarshalled into the corresponding language object as soon as it > >>>> comes out > >>>> of the wire. I would say XML/JSON should meet 9

Re: YAML update request handler

2008-02-22 Thread Grant Ingersoll
e requirements because all the platforms come with an unmarshaller for both of these. But,If it can offer good performance improvement it is worth trying. --Noble On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 3:41 AM, alexander lind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Feb 20, 2008, at 9:31 AM, Doug Steige

Re: YAML update request handler

2008-02-22 Thread Noble Paul നോബിള്‍ नोब्ळ्
out > >> of the wire. I would say XML/JSON should meet 99% of the requirements > >> because all the platforms come with an unmarshaller for both of these. > >> > >> But,If it can offer good performance improvement it is worth trying. > >> --Noble >

Re: YAML update request handler

2008-02-22 Thread Grant Ingersoll
> wrote: On Feb 20, 2008, at 9:31 AM, Doug Steigerwald wrote: A few months back I wrote a YAML update request handler to see if we could post documents faster than with XMl. We did see some small speed improvements (didn't write down the numbers), but the hacked together code was proba

Re: YAML update request handler

2008-02-22 Thread Noble Paul നോബിള്‍ नोब्ळ्
th an unmarshaller for both of these. > > > > > > But,If it can offer good performance improvement it is worth trying. > > > --Noble > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 3:41 AM, alexander lind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > >

Re: YAML update request handler

2008-02-21 Thread Noble Paul നോബിള്‍ नोब्ळ्
Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 3:41 AM, alexander lind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > >> On Feb 20, 2008, at 9:31 AM, Doug Steigerwald wrote: > >> > >>> A few months back I wrote a YAML update request handler to see if we > >>> could post docume

Re: YAML update request handler

2008-02-21 Thread Walter Underwood
th an unmarshaller for both of these. >> >> But,If it can offer good performance improvement it is worth trying. >> --Noble >> >> On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 3:41 AM, alexander lind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> >>> On Feb 20, 2008, at 9:

Re: YAML update request handler

2008-02-21 Thread Grant Ingersoll
3:41 AM, alexander lind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Feb 20, 2008, at 9:31 AM, Doug Steigerwald wrote: A few months back I wrote a YAML update request handler to see if we could post documents faster than with XMl. We did see some small speed improvements (didn't write down the n

Re: YAML update request handler

2008-02-21 Thread Noble Paul നോബിള്‍ नोब्ळ्
it can offer good performance improvement it is worth trying. --Noble On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 3:41 AM, alexander lind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Feb 20, 2008, at 9:31 AM, Doug Steigerwald wrote: > > > A few months back I wrote a YAML update request handler to see if

Re: YAML update request handler

2008-02-20 Thread alexander lind
On Feb 20, 2008, at 9:31 AM, Doug Steigerwald wrote: A few months back I wrote a YAML update request handler to see if we could post documents faster than with XMl. We did see some small speed improvements (didn't write down the numbers), but the hacked together code was probably m

YAML update request handler

2008-02-20 Thread Doug Steigerwald
A few months back I wrote a YAML update request handler to see if we could post documents faster than with XMl. We did see some small speed improvements (didn't write down the numbers), but the hacked together code was probably making it slower as well. Not sure if there are faster