Re: Improving proximity search performance

2012-09-15 Thread Jack Krupansky
r 15, 2012 6:27 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: Improving proximity search performance i have the same problem.and did you got some good idea? wish you can share it.thanks 在 2012-2-18 上午8:52,"Bryan Loofbourrow" 写道: Apologies. I meant to type “1.4 TB” and somehow typed “1

RE: Improving proximity search performance

2012-09-15 Thread 蒋明原
must > be using Sneakernet to run my searches. > > > > -- Bryan Loofbourrow > > > -- > > *From:* Bryan Loofbourrow [mailto:bloofbour...@knowledgemosaic.com] > *Sent:* Thursday, February 16, 2012 7:07 PM > *To:* 'solr-user@lucene.apache

RE: Improving proximity search performance

2012-02-17 Thread Bryan Loofbourrow
...@knowledgemosaic.com] *Sent:* Thursday, February 16, 2012 7:07 PM *To:* 'solr-user@lucene.apache.org' *Subject:* Improving proximity search performance Here’s my use case. I expect to set up a Solr index that is approximately 1.4GB (this is a real number from the proof-of-concept using the

Improving proximity search performance

2012-02-16 Thread Bryan Loofbourrow
Here’s my use case. I expect to set up a Solr index that is approximately 1.4GB (this is a real number from the proof-of-concept using the real data, which consists of about 10 million documents, many of significant size, and making use of the FastVectorHighlighter to do highlighting on the body te