Have you tried watching the threads in a monitoring program like VisualVM?
We have found that at a certain point the solr software starts locking in
the synchronous calls including logging.
--
Jeff Newburn
Software Engineer, Zappos.com
jnewb...@zappos.com - 702-943-7562
> From: Raf Gemm
We have a solr plugin that would be much easier to write if commons-lang was
available. Why does solr not have this library? Is there any drawbacks to
pulling in the commons lang for StringUtils?
--
Jeff Newburn
Software Engineer, Zappos.com
programmatic
way we could possibly understand this scenario and return correct results.
--
Jeff Newburn
Software Engineer, Zappos.com
jnewb...@zappos.com
pty
core allows the system to run out of heap.
--
Jeff Newburn
Software Engineer, Zappos.com
jnewb...@zappos.com - 702-943-7562
> From: Mark Miller
> Reply-To:
> Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 17:21:47 -0400
> To:
> Subject: Re: Solr Trunk Heap Space Issues
>
> Mark
So could that potentially explain our use of more ram on indexing? Or is
this a rare edge case.
--
Jeff Newburn
Software Engineer, Zappos.com
jnewb...@zappos.com - 702-943-7562
> From: Mark Miller
> Reply-To:
> Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 15:30:50 -0400
> To:
> Subject: Re: Solr T
idea where the LRUCache is getting its information or what is even in there.
--
Jeff Newburn
Software Engineer, Zappos.com
jnewb...@zappos.com - 702-943-7562
> From: Yonik Seeley
> Reply-To:
> Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 13:32:32 -0400
> To:
> Subject: Re: Solr Trunk Heap Space Iss
reindex.
--
Jeff Newburn
Software Engineer, Zappos.com
jnewb...@zappos.com - 702-943-7562
> From: Yonik Seeley
> Reply-To:
> Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 13:32:32 -0400
> To:
> Subject: Re: Solr Trunk Heap Space Issues
>
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Jeff Newburn wrote:
&g
Ok I have eliminated all queries for warming and am still getting the heap
space dump. Any ideas at this point what could be wrong? This seems like a
huge increase in memory to go from indexing without issues to not being able
to even with warming off.
--
Jeff Newburn
Software Engineer
I reran the test to try to ensure that other cores on the instance didn't
have searches against them. This time I get NPE errors just trying to get
into the stats after the system hits its limit.
--
Jeff Newburn
Software Engineer, Zappos.com
jnewb...@zappos.com - 702-943-7562
> Fr
: 0.00
cumulative_inserts : 0
cumulative_evictions : 0
--
Jeff Newburn
Software Engineer, Zappos.com
jnewb...@zappos.com - 702-943-7562
> From: Yonik Seeley
> Reply-To:
> Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 10:04:27 -0400
> To:
> Subject: Re: Solr Trunk Heap Space Issues
>
> On Fri, Oc
Ah yes we do have some warming queries which would look like a search. Did
that side change enough to push up the memory limits where we would run out
like this? Also, would FastLRU cache make a difference?
--
Jeff Newburn
Software Engineer, Zappos.com
jnewb...@zappos.com - 702-943-7562
my May version did this
without any problems whatsoever.
--
Jeff Newburn
Software Engineer, Zappos.com
jnewb...@zappos.com - 702-943-7562
> From: Mark Miller
> Reply-To:
> Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2009 17:57:28 -0400
> To:
> Subject: Re: Solr Trunk Heap Space Issues
>
> Yoni
Added the parameter and it didn't seem to dump when it hit the gc limit
error. Any other thoughts?
--
Jeff Newburn
Software Engineer, Zappos.com
jnewb...@zappos.com - 702-943-7562
> From: Bill Au
> Reply-To:
> Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 12:16:53 -0400
> To:
> Subject: Re: S
1, 2009 8:40:12 AM org.apache.solr.common.SolrException log
SEVERE: java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: GC overhead limit exceeded
--
Jeff Newburn
Software Engineer, Zappos.com
jnewb...@zappos.com - 702-943-7562
identical
core takes only a fraction of a second. Is there something with that core
that could be bogging down the whole instance?
--
Jeff Newburn
Software Engineer, Zappos.com
jnewb...@zappos.com - 702-943-7562
> From: Jeffery Newburn
> Reply-To:
> Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 14:14:24 -
java:619)
Locked ownable synchronizers:
- locked java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock$NonfairSync@@">1ac730b
--
Jeff Newburn
Software Engineer, Zappos.com
jnewb...@zappos.com - 702-943-7562
Ah that makes more sense. It does seem that the coord would be a good
option especially in cases like this.
--
Jeff Newburn
Software Engineer, Zappos.com
jnewb...@zappos.com - 702-943-7562
> From: Yonik Seeley
> Reply-To:
> Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 14:44:50 -0400
> To:
&
= idf(docFreq=120, numDocs=136731)
0.625 = fieldNorm(field=productNameSearch, doc=8142)
--
Jeff Newburn
Software Engineer, Zappos.com
jnewb...@zappos.com - 702-943-7562
We also use 1.4 which has gotten hit with load tests of up to
2000queries/sec. Biggest thing is make sure you are using the slaves for
that kind of load. Other than that 1.4 is pretty impressive.
--
Jeff Newburn
Software Engineer, Zappos.com
jnewb...@zappos.com - 702-943-7562
> From: O
Ed,
How do I go about enabling the gc logging for solr?
--
Jeff Newburn
Software Engineer, Zappos.com
jnewb...@zappos.com - 702-943-7562
> From: Ed Summers
> Reply-To:
> Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 10:39:03 -0400
> To:
> Subject: Re: Random Slowness
>
> I haven't
nSale, styleId
100%
1
5
*:*
?
brandNameFacet,productTypeFacet,productName,categoryFacet,subCategoryFacet,p
ersonalityFacet,colorFacet,heelHeight,expandedGender
1
1
?
spellcheck
--
Jeff Newburn
Software Engineer, Zappos.com
jnewb...@zappos.com - 702-943-7562
> From: Erik
goryFacet:Shoes&fq=subCategory
Facet:Heels&fq=personalityFacet:Dress&fq=attrFacet_Style:Pump&fq=size:5}
hits=644 status=0 QTime=3750
INFO: [6pm-main] webapp=/solr path=/select
params={wt=javabin&rows=100&facet.sort=true&start=0&q=shoes&qt=dismax&fq=exp
andedGender:Kids&fq=productTypeFacet:Shoes&fq=gender:girls&fq=brandNameFacet
:"UGG+Kids"} hits=17 status=0 QTime=3789
--
Jeff Newburn
Software Engineer, Zappos.com
jnewb...@zappos.com - 702-943-7562
Does anyone have links or books to recommended reading on search in general.
Would like to see some literature on larger search concepts and ideas.
--
Jeff Newburn
Software Engineer, Zappos.com
jnewb...@zappos.com - 702-943-7562
work) you
would search (Phone: *-111-). Keep in mind this way will work
syntactically but basically changes the index into a file sort so you will
see a performance dip.
--
Jeff Newburn
Software Engineer, Zappos.com
jnewb...@zappos.com - 702-943-7562
> From: Erik Hatcher
> Reply-
hit. We
have it set to both optimize and commit.
commit
optimize
--
Jeff Newburn
Software Engineer, Zappos.com
jnewb...@zappos.com - 702-943-7562
> From: Gurjot Singh
> Reply-To:
> Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 17:04:58 -0400
> To:
> Subject: Quest
trying to use.
--
Jeff Newburn
Software Engineer, Zappos.com
jnewb...@zappos.com - 702-943-7562
> From: solenweg
> Reply-To:
> Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 03:51:04 -0700 (PDT)
> To:
> Subject: Search results depending on search word length?
>
>
> New to solr so maybe it
We are using a trunk build from approximately the same time with little to
no issues including the new replication.
--
Jeff Newburn
Software Engineer, Zappos.com
jnewb...@zappos.com - 702-943-7562
> From: Shalin Shekhar Mangar
> Reply-To:
> Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 21:21:44 +
to work for us. Hope it helps
--
Jeff Newburn
Software Engineer, Zappos.com
jnewb...@zappos.com - 702-943-7562
> From: Yao Ge
> Reply-To:
> Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 14:03:24 -0700 (PDT)
> To:
> Subject: Re: spell checking
>
>
> Yes. I did. I was not able to grasp the
That is exactly what we were missing. As soon as we added the sharedlib in
solr.xml it started working. Thank you very much for all the help on this
one. It is greatly appreciated.
--
Jeff Newburn
Software Engineer, Zappos.com
jnewb...@zappos.com - 702-943-7562
> From: Mark Miller
>
am
not sure why it is that the system is seeing the jar in the main lib
directory and then choosing to ignore it.
--
Jeff Newburn
Software Engineer, Zappos.com
jnewb...@zappos.com - 702-943-7562
> From: Mark Miller
> Reply-To:
> Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 10:10:27 -0400
> To:
&
We are using solr 1.4 on trunk as of 5/7/2009. What patch did you want us
to apply?
--
Jeff Newburn
Software Engineer, Zappos.com
jnewb...@zappos.com - 702-943-7562
> From: Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ्
> Reply-To:
> Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:16:19 +0530
> To:
> Subject: Re: P
Starting Coyote HTTP/1.1 on http-8080
May 22, 2009 7:38:27 AM org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol start
INFO: Starting Coyote HTTP/1.1 on http-8443
May 22, 2009 7:38:27 AM org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina start
INFO: Server startup in 2434 ms
--
Jeff Newburn
Software Engineer, Zappos.c
One additional note we are on 1.4 tunk as of 5/7/2009. Just not sure why it
won't load since it obviously works fine if directly inserted into the
WEB-INF directory.
--
Jeff Newburn
Software Engineer, Zappos.com
jnewb...@zappos.com - 702-943-7562
> From: Mark Miller
> Reply-To:
me/zetasolr/lib/FacetCubeComponent.jar' to Solr
classloader
However as soon as it tries the component it cannot find the class.
--
Jeff Newburn
Software Engineer, Zappos.com
jnewb...@zappos.com - 702-943-7562
> From: Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ्
> Reply-To:
> Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 10:19:
java.lang.Class.forName(Class.java:247)
at
org.apache.solr.core.SolrResourceLoader.findClass(SolrResourceLoader.java:29
4)
... 27 more
--
Jeff Newburn
Software Engineer, Zappos.com
jnewb...@zappos.com - 702-943-7562
> From: Grant Ingersoll
> Reply-To:
> Date: Wed, 20 May 2009
06)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClassInternal(ClassLoader.java:319)
at java.lang.Class.forName0(Native Method)
at java.lang.Class.forName(Class.java:247)
at
org.apache.solr.core.SolrResourceLoader.findClass(SolrResourceLoader.java:29
4)
... 36 more
--
Jeff Newburn
Software Engineer,
}/tomcat/webapp/solr/WEB-INF/lib/
Doesn¹t Work:
{solr.home}/lib/
//Code snippets
package org.apache.solr.handler.component;
public class FacetCubeComponent extends SearchComponent implements
SolrCoreAware
SolrConfig
spellcheck
facetcube
--
Jeff Newburn
Excellent! Thank you I am going to start testing that.
--
Jeff Newburn
Software Engineer, Zappos.com
jnewb...@zappos.com - 702-943-7562
> From: Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ्
> Reply-To:
> Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 20:26:02 +0530
> To:
> Subject: Re: aka Replication Stall
>
>
> On May 6, 2009, at 3:25 PM, Jeff Newburn wrote:
>
>> We are trying to implement a SearchCompnent plugin. I have been
>> looking at
>> QueryElevateComponent trying to weed through what needs to be done.
>> My
>> basic desire is to get the results back and m
the
latest 1?
--
Jeff Newburn
Software Engineer, Zappos.com
jnewb...@zappos.com - 702-943-7562
> From: Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ्
> Reply-To:
> Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 10:05:49 +0530
> To:
> Subject: Re: aka Replication Stall
>
> SOLR-1096
client?
--
Jeff Newburn
Software Engineer, Zappos.com
jnewb...@zappos.com - 702-943-7562
?
elevate.xml
123621333
790732532
1274
?
synonyms.txt
1237990595000
816919275
68713
--
Jeff Newburn
Software Engineer, Zappos.com
jnewb...@zappos.com - 702-943-7562
> From: Akshay
> Reply-To:
> Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 01:37:54 +0530
> To:
> Subject: Re: replicated index files
We see the exact same thing. Additionally, that url returns 404 on a
multicore and gives an error when I add the core.
−
−
0
0
no indexversion specified
--
Jeff Newburn
Software Engineer, Zappos.com
jnewb...@zappos.com - 702-943-7562
> From: Jian Han Guo
> Reply-To:
> Date
1
1
collapse
spellcheck
--
Jeff Newburn
Software Engineer, Zappos.com
jnewb...@zappos.com - 702-943-7562
> From: Ryan McKinley
> Reply-To:
> Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 10:48:19 -0400
> To:
&
What are the current issues holding this back? Seems to be working with
some minor bug fixes.
--
Jeff Newburn
Software Engineer, Zappos.com
jnewb...@zappos.com - 702-943-7562
> From: Otis Gospodnetic
> Reply-To:
> Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 20:30:22 -0700 (PDT)
> To:
&
We are currently trying to do the same thing. With the patch unaltered we
can use fq as long as collapsing is turned on. If we just send a normal
document level query with an fq parameter it blows up.
Additionally, it does not appear that the collapse.facet option works at
all.
--
Jeff
Fastest way I know of to get the schema is using the luke browser.
http://localhost/solr/admin/luke
It returns in xml and has tons of info you probably aren't interested it.
However, it does contain information like fields and type.
--
Jeff Newburn
Software Engineer, Zappos.com
have
all widths available for all documents that match on size 7 even though most
don¹t come in a wide width. We are looking for strategies to filter facets
based on other facets in separate queries.
--
Jeff Newburn
Software Engineer, Zappos.com
jnewb...@zappos.com - 702-943-7562
I have noticed that I can¹t seem to make sense of the histogram. For every
field the x-axis shows powers of 2 which make no sense for things like brand
name. Am I looking at it wrong or is it having issues?
--
Jeff Newburn
Software Engineer, Zappos.com
jnewb...@zappos.com - 702-943-7562
I apologize for the delay. The replication stalling out doesn't happen
daily. I will paste the thread dump below to try to help. This is on a
server that is currently locked on replication for a few hours. Any more
information please let me know. There are no errors in the logs either so
very s
Mar 23 00:22:55 PDT 2009
Files Downloaded: 12 / 163
Downloaded: 4.12 MB / 1.41 GB [0.0%]
Downloading File: _5no.tis, Downloaded: 0 bytes / 629.57 KB [0.0%]
Time Elapsed: 26371s, Estimated Time Remaining: 9216278s, Speed: 163
bytes/s
--
Jeff Newburn
Software Engineer, Zappos.com
be appreciated.
--
Jeff Newburn
Software Engineer, Zappos.com
jnewb...@zappos.com - 702-943-7562
> From: Jeff Newburn
> Reply-To:
> Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 10:20:36 -0800
> To:
> Subject: Re: Trunk Replication Page Issue
>
> I did an ant clean and then dist and it is stil
I did an ant clean and then dist and it is still showing. I attached the
servlet class and java files. The svn up says: At revision 749397.
--
Jeff Newburn
Software Engineer, Zappos.com
jnewb...@zappos.com - 702-943-7562
> From: Akshay
> Reply-To:
> Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 11:22
(JspServletWrapper.java:3
74)
... 24 more
--
Jeff Newburn
Software Engineer, Zappos.com
jnewb...@zappos.com - 702-943-7562
In your example there is no space between +wow -kill so my guess is that
solr is interpreting it as wow-kill all one word. Then depending on the
field type the tokenizer is probably splitting wow and kill into 2 words
along the -.
--
Jeff Newburn
> From: sunnyfr
> Reply-To:
> Date
Unfortunately, the stopword filter acts funny (depending on who you ask) in
dismax. The short version is that the stopwords filter has to be on all
fields being queried on for minimum matches to work. We have the same issue
with one of our brands. We require all word matching so "The North Face"
I know this question was asked a while back but is there a timeframe for
when solr 1.4 will be put into the stable release category?
-Jeff
aping.
> It could be done in lots more places to peace of mind's sake, but
> ultimately I think we want stats.jsp to deprecate in favor of a
> request handler outputting the stats.
>
> Erik
>
> On Feb 5, 2009, at 2:40 PM, Jeff Newburn wrote:
>
>> Unfortunately,
ystem?
>
> Erik
>
> On Feb 5, 2009, at 1:56 PM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
>
>>
>> On Feb 5, 2009, at 1:44 PM, Jeff Newburn wrote:
>>
>>> I am getting the following on the stats page.
>>>
>>> XML Parsing Error: not well-formed
>>> Lo
I am getting the following on the stats page.
XML Parsing Error: not well-formed
Location: http://solr2.zappos.net:8080/solr/zeta-main/admin/stats.jsp
Line Number 1327, Column 48:
---^
Not sure what the deal is since it has been running fine for
ter to rewrite multi-core URL to non-multi-core
> URL for all solr instances.
> - upgrade app to use multi-core URL
> - upgrade solr instances to multi-core when convenient and remove
> rewrite filter
>
>
>
> -Bryan
>
>
>
>
> On Jan 28, 2009, at J
We are moving from single core to multicore. We have a few servers that we
want to migrate one at a time to ensure that each one functions. This
process is proving difficult as there is no default core to allow the
application to talk to the solr servers uniformly (ie without a core name
during c
The best way to find out what was wrong with the request is going to be the
web server logs. It should throw an exception that usually complains about
fields missing or incorrect.
As to the committing solr has an autocommit option that will fire after a
designated amount of changes have been ente
at
> org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina.start(Catalina.java:578) at
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source) at
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source) at
> java.lang.reflect.M
jargon
> on the admin page reporting the error, but is that what you want?
>
>
>
> Jeff Newburn wrote:
>>
>> Are there any error log messages?
>>
>> The difference between a string and text is that string is basically
>> stored
>> with no modific
Are there any error log messages?
The difference between a string and text is that string is basically stored
with no modification (it is the solr.StrField). The text type is actually
defined in the fieldtype section and usually contains a tokenizer and some
analyzers (usually stemming, lowercasi
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 12:00 AM, Jeff Newburn wrote:
>> We have both. A majority of them are just empty but others have almost a
>> full index worth of files. I have also noticed that during a lengthy index
>> update the system will throw errors about how it cannot move
ബിള് नोब्ळ्"
wrote:
> Jeff ,
> Do you see both the empty index. dirs as well as the extra files
> in the index?
> --Noble
>
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 10:37 PM, Jeff Newburn wrote:
>> We are seeing something very similar. Ours is intermittent and usually
>
My apologies. No we are using linux, tomcat setup.
On 1/22/09 9:15 AM, "Shalin Shekhar Mangar" wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 10:37 PM, Jeff Newburn wrote:
>
>> We are seeing something very similar. Ours is intermittent and usually
>> happens a great deal on
We are seeing something very similar. Ours is intermittent and usually
happens a great deal on random days. Often it seems to occur during large
index updates on the master.
On 1/22/09 8:58 AM, "Shalin Shekhar Mangar" wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 10:18 PM, Jaco wrote:
>
>> Hm, I don't kn
Can someone please make sense of why the following occurs in our system.
The first item barely matches but scores higher than the second one that
matches all over the place. The second one is a MUCH better match but has a
worse score. These are in the same query results. All I can see are the
nor
acetingOverview
>
> -Todd Feak
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Newburn [mailto:jnewb...@zappos.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2008 7:39 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Ngram Repeats
>
> I have set up an ngram filter and have run into a probl
I have set up an ngram filter and have run into a problem. Our index is
basically composed of products as the unique id. Each product also has a
brand name assigned to it. There are much fewer unique brand names than
products in the index. I tried to set up an ngram based on the brand name
but
out.
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 8:33 PM, Jeff Newburn
> wrote:
> Thank you for the quick response. I will keep
> an eye on that to see how it
> progresses.
>
>
> On 12/10/08 8:03 PM, "Noble
> Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ्"
> wrote:
>
> > This is
I have discovered some weirdness with our Minimum Match functionality.
Essentially it comes up with absolutely no results on certain queries.
Basically, searches with 2 words and 1 being ³the² don¹t have a return
result. From what we can gather the minimum match criteria is making it
such that if
21
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 5:30 AM, Jeff Newburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I am curious as to whether there is a solution to be able to replicate
>> solrconfig.xml with the 1.4 replication. The obvious problem is that the
>> master would replicate the
I am curious as to whether there is a solution to be able to replicate
solrconfig.xml with the 1.4 replication. The obvious problem is that the
master would replicate the solrconfig turning all slaves into masters with
its config. I have also tried on a whim to configure the master and slave
on t
Unfortunately, as it stands the interestingTerms and the debugQuery do not
explain why solr chose the matches it did for moreLikeThis. There is
currently a task in jira to try to add the information to debugQuery.
The ticket can be found here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-860
-Jeff
Ok just FYI solr replaces the file instead of editing. This means that the
webserver needs permissions in the directory to delete and create the
solr.xml file. Once I fixed that it no longer gave IOException errors.
On 11/20/08 8:29 AM, "Jeff Newburn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
I am trying to use the api for the solr cores. Reload works great but when
I try to UNLOAD I get a massive exception in IOException. It seems to
unload the module but doesn¹t remove it from the configuration file. The
solr.xml file is full read and write but still errors. Any ideas?
Solr.xml
s
I am trying to figure out how the synonym filter processes multi word
inputs. I have checked the analyzer in the GUI with some confusing results.
The indexed field has ³The North Face² as a value. The synonym file has
morthface, morth face, noethface, noeth face, norhtface, norht face,
nortface,
Popular.
>
>
> On Nov 14, 2008, at 1:53 PM, Jeff Newburn wrote:
>
>> I am trying to get the onlyMorePopular variable to function
>> correctly. I
>> have tried adding both spellchecker.onlyMorePopular as well as
>> sp.query.onlyMorePopular yet neither of thes
I am trying to get the onlyMorePopular variable to function correctly. I
have tried adding both spellchecker.onlyMorePopular as well as
sp.query.onlyMorePopular yet neither of these seem to change the spelling
suggestion response. I am not sure if I simply do not understand what it is
intended to
r MLT)
>
>
> On Nov 11, 2008, at 6:56 PM, Jeff Newburn wrote:
>
>> Thanks Otis! I understand what the parameters do to help modify for
>> the
>> most part. What I am trying to understand is how the related items
>> are
>> related. Certain search results
reLikeThis?
>
> Those are the knobs that will let you control quality of MLT results.
>
> Otis
> --
> Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Jeff Newburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To
Hi All,
Anybody know of how to get some useful debugging information for
morelikethis search component in SOLR 1.4? I am trying to make the results
more relevant to each product. Unfortunately, I cannot seem to find a way
to get information that would be useful to find out what is matching. I
h
Lucas,
Did you upgrade to version 1.4 of solr? The replication is very newly
implemented and not available until very recently.
-Jeff
On 11/11/08 10:38 AM, "banished phantom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello everyone ! I'm new in the Solr list. I'va been using Solr 1.2 for a
> while and als
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SearchComponent
> and specifically:
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpellCheckComponent
>
> It works independently from the query parser (i.e. dismax).
>
> -Grant
>
>
> On Nov 10, 2008, at 7:00 PM, Jeff Newburn wrote:
>
>> I am still rel
I am still relatively new to solr. I have gotten the
spellcheckerrequesthandler working the way I would like. Now I am diving
into the search component version of the spell checker. I was hoping
someone could help explain 1. What specifically does the searchcomponent
offer and how would I go abo
89 matches
Mail list logo
