l (but dangerous)
tool.
Bottom line: it doesn't like weak references in ThreadLocals, like in
Solr's CloseableThreadLocal class.
b.
On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 4:34 PM Bram Biesbrouck <
bram.biesbro...@reinvention.be> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I think I might have discovered a synch
Hi all,
I think I might have discovered a synchronization bug when ingesting a lot
of data into Solr, but want to check with the specialists first ;-)
I'm using a little custom written map/reduce framework that boots a
20-something threads to do some heavy processing on data-preparation. When
thi
around it.
On Wed, 9 Oct 2019, 14:49 Mikhail Khludnev, wrote:
> I might not fully understand how you would like to combine them. The
> possible reason is that [subquery] expect regular Solr Response to act on,
> but [child] might yield something hairish.
>
> On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 a
n't
> hesitate to contribute doc improvement.
> [subquery] is a neat thing, it's just queries without relying on particular
> use case, if my understanding is right one may request something like
> _path_ field in [subquery], which may let to reconstruct hierarchy.
&
Hi all,
I'm diving deep into the ChildDocTransformer and its
related SubQueryAugmenter.
First of all, I think there's a bug in the Solr docs about [child]. It
states:
"This transformer returns all descendant documents of each parent document
matching your query in a flat list nested inside the ma
ldren.fq=-parent:true ?
>
> On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 8:52 PM Bram Biesbrouck <
> bram.biesbro...@reinvention.be> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm struggling with a little period-sign difficulty and instead of
> pulling
> > out my hair, I wonder if any
ncat($row.id,".")}
or
{!prefix f=id v="$row.id\.")}
or
{!query defType=lucene v=concat("id:",$row.id,".")}
I get no results back.
I feel like I'm missing only a simple thing here, but can't seem to
pinpoint it.
Any help?
b.
<http://www.reinven
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 7:11 PM Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 6/17/2019 4:46 AM, Bram Biesbrouck wrote:
> > q={!parent which=-(parentUri:*)}*:*
>
> Pure negative queries do not work in Lucene. Sometimes, when you do a
> single-clause negative query, Solr is able to dete
Dear all,
I'm new to this list, so let me introduce myself. I'm Bram, author of a
linked data framework called Stralo. We're working toward version 1.0, in
which we're integrating Solr indexing and querying of RDF triples (
https://github.com/republic-of-reinvention/com.stralo.framework/milestone/
