Say you have a dozen servers, one core each. Say you wish to add an
agent reference inside the solrconfig update response descriptor.
Would you do that for every core?
Thanks in advance.
Jack
Debug response given below,
(stnostem:((옵티머스 OR "엘지 스마트폰") AND NOT
stnostem:("옵티머스 프라임" OR 프라임)))
(stnostem:((옵티머스 OR "엘지 스마트폰") AND NOT stnostem:("옵티머스
프라임" OR 프라임)))
+(stnostem:옵티머스 PhraseQuery(stnostem:"엘지 스마트폰"))
-(PhraseQuery(stnostem:"옵티머스 프라임") stnostem:프라임)
+(stnostem:옵티머스 stnostem:"엘지
Does it mean that when you redo indexing after the upgrade to 4.1 shard
splitting will work in 4.2?
Met vriendelijke groeten
Arkadi Colson
Smartbit bvba • Hoogstraat 13 • 3670 Meeuwen
T +32 11 64 08 80 • F +32 11 64 08 81
On 02/10/2013 05:21 PM, Michael Della Bitta wrote:
No. You can just up
Thanks Upayavira . Really helpful.
Cheers,Pragyanshis
> From: u...@odoko.co.uk
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Search a Phrase
> Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 20:39:23 +
>
> If you have a field of type 'text_general', searching for:
>
> q=good microwave
>
> Will find any documen
Hi,
did you try Heritrix?
The documents are stored as html inside an warc file which can be
postprocessed easily.
Cheers,
Markus
On 11.02.2013 12:16, SivaKarthik wrote:
Dear Erick,
Thanks for ur relpy..
ya..nutch can meet my requirement...
but the problem is, i want to store th
Hi Siva,
You will probably get a better reply if you head over to the nutch mailing list
[http://nutch.apache.org/mailing_lists.html] and ask there.
Nutch 2.1 may be what you are looking for (stores pages in NoSQL database).
Regards,
Sujit
On Feb 10, 2013, at 9:16 PM, SivaKarthik wrote:
> De
Show us the parsed query that you get with &debugQuery=true
Actually this may be the "pure negative" bug where you need to change:
A AND -B
into
A AND (*:* -B)
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Cool Techi
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2013 12:30 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache
Any help here, still not able to understand what might be causing this. I have
tried all combinations below, but to no avail,
(stnostem:((옵티머스 OR "엘지 스마트폰") AND NOT stnostem:("옵티머스 프라임" OR 프라임)))
(stnostem:((옵티머스 OR "엘지 스마트폰") AND - stnostem:("옵티머스 프라임" OR 프라임)))
What could be wrong here.
Fr
Lance did some work on opennlp integration. Check the Wiki.
Otis
Solr & ElasticSearch Support
http://sematext.com/
On Feb 8, 2013 4:12 PM, "SUJIT PAL" wrote:
> Hi Bart,
>
> I did some work with UIMA but this was to annotate the data before it goes
> to Lucene/Solr, ie not built as a UpdateReque
Assuming that createdDate is a DateField in your schema.xml, the object
returned by SolrJ will be a Date object (though you will need to cast it to a
Date).
-Michael
Hi,
Can someone explain what is the response of solrj. After i am done, what
will be the format of the result? For example, if normal response is like
this by doing query http://localhost/solr/core/q=*:*&wtjson:
{response
{numfound:# , docs{
[
{
id="#"
createdDate="#"
}
{
i
What Solr are you using? In Solr4, it's mostly new, see:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrAdaptersForLuceneSpatial4
Best
Erick
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Kissue Kissue wrote:
> I can see Solr has the field type solr.LatLonType which supports spatial
> based on longitudes and latitudes. Do
Not that I know of, sorry.
Best
Erick
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Kai Gülzau wrote:
> I there a way to postprocess a field after analyze?
>
> Saying postprocess I think of renaming, moving or appending fields.
>
>
> Some more information:
>
> My schema.xml contains several language suffix
Try adding &debug=query to your query. You haven't given us the expansion
in your synonyms file so it's really hard to say. I suspect from the very
fragmentary problem statement that when you query an a b, you're getting
documents that have either a or b in them, which is probably entirely
separate
Not really, non text fields really don't get an analysis chain. The
simplest thing would probably be to use copyField and store it both
textually and as a numeric. You could handle that on the indexing side
from the client or by writing an update component.
But IPv4 addresses are really just 32-b
suggester simply looks at the terms in the index and returns some of them,
it's not aware (that I know of) of which docs the terms came from, so I
suspect you're out of luck unless you do something custom. Although what
that would be eludes me...
Best
Erick
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 4:12 AM, Niklas
If you have a field of type 'text_general', searching for:
q=good microwave
Will find any documents with either 'good' or 'microwave' in them.
Searching for:
q="good microwave"
will find any documents that contain both terms next to each other.
q="good microwave"^5 good microwave
will f
The consensus here seems to be NOT to do that. Have 2 SolrClouds, one per
DC and feed them the same data. That way each cloud has its own quorum of
ZKs, and as long as both clouds are up, they should be in sync. You have
true DR in that each site is separate and not dependent on any data from
the
Hi,
I did one work around to get all documents that contains "Good" or "Microwave"
or "Good Microwave",if i will pass "Good Microwave" as q parameter please guide
me wheather i am going in right direction or not.
I defined two field type(text_general and shingleString) in my schema like below
No. You can just update Solr in place. But...
If you're using Solr Cloud, your documents won't be hashed in a way
that lets you do shard splitting in 4.2. That seemed to be the
consensus during Solr Boot Camp.
Michael Della Bitta
Appinions
18 East
Do I have to recreate the collections/cores?
Do I have to reindex?
thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Do-I-have-to-reindex-when-upgrading-from-solr-4-0-to-4-1-tp4039560.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
I upgraded today from a 4.1 nightly build to the 4.1 realease.
Now I noticed that the naming of collection shards changed.
When I create a collection an identifier for the shard and the replica
will be added automatically?
Can I turn this off somehow or is there a way to retrieve the corena
Hi Thank you for the reply.
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Prakhar Birla wrote:
> Hi Rajani,
>
> I recently tried to solve a similar problem as the one you have. (I think)
> Solr doesn't support a param to achieve this because if we were to limit
> the no of documents returned, to get the next
23 matches
Mail list logo
