Hi
Thanks for your replies.
I carried out these 2 steps (it did not solve my problem):
1. I tried setting responseBuffering to adaptive. Did not work.
2. For checking Database connection I wrote a simple java program to connect to
database and fetch some results with the same driver that I use
this seems to be good. if it is possible , i want to make it from solr
features / configuration changes. but can go for it, if it is not possible
or not much compatible.
Thanks.
iorixxx wrote
>
>> I have configured spellchecker component in my solr. it
>> works with custom
>> request handler (h
We are using solr query parser... just need some schema and / or solrconfig
configuration to do the misspell search and find results.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/need-a-way-so-that-solr-return-result-for-misspelled-terms-tp3530584p3532979.html
Sent from th
Thanks for confirming that, and laying out the options, Robert.
-Mike
On 11/23/2011 9:03 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
hi,
locale sensitive range queries don't work with these filters, only sort,
although erick erickson has a patch that will enable this (the lowercasing
wildcards patch, then you coul
Thanks for the information. I will play with it.
Spark
2011/11/23 Nagendra Nagarajayya
> Spark:
>
> Solr with RankingAlgorithm is not a plugin but a change of search library
> from Lucene to RankingAlgorithm. Here is more info on the changes you will
> need to make to your solrconfig.xml:
>
> h
Thank you for your sharing, My current solution is similar to 2).
But my problem is ACL is early-binding (which means I build index and
embedded ACL with document index) I don't want to rebuild full index(a
lucene/solr Document with PDF content and ACL) when front end change
only permission setting
I have now enabled the infix search. So you will be able to do both edge as
well as infix search. Type "francisco peak" in the edge field, and in the
below infix input field, try, "cisco peak", both will get you to the same
selections.
Please give it a try now:
http://solr-ra.tgels.org/solr-ra-au
hi,
locale sensitive range queries don't work with these filters, only sort,
although erick erickson has a patch that will enable this (the lowercasing
wildcards patch, then you could add this filter to your multiterm chain).
separately locale range queries and sort both work easily on trunk (wit
: Now there are some scenario when I want just the pf active (without
: qf). Othen then surrounding my query with double quotes, is there
: another way to do that? I mean, i would like to do the following
:
: _query:"{!dismax pf=author^100}vincent kwner"
...nope ... the pf is just a boosting fac
On 11/23/2011 2:54 PM, Uomesh wrote:
Hi,
case insesitive search is not working if I use WordDelimiterFilter
splitOnCaseChange="1"
I am searching for word norton and here is result
norton: returns result
Norton: returns result
but
nOrton: no results
I want nOrton should results. Please help. b
Hi,
I am searching on movie titles. with synonyms text file mapped to 1,one.
With this, when I am searching for '1' I am expecting '1 in kind' but I am
getting results which have titles like "2001: My year" .
I am using query time analyser with
I am going to try with expand=false. But anyt
Hi,
case insesitive search is not working if I use WordDelimiterFilter
splitOnCaseChange="1"
I am searching for word norton and here is result
norton: returns result
Norton: returns result
but
nOrton: no results
I want nOrton should results. Please help. below is my field type.
Thanks Hoss,
I will give those a try and let you know.
Cheers.
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 8:35 PM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> : Which answers my query needs. BUT, my boost function actually changes
> some
> : of the results to be of score 0, which I want to be excluded from the
> : result set.
>
>
I'm using CollectionKeyFilter to sort my documents using the Unicode
root collation, and my documents do appear to be getting sorted
correctly, but I'm getting weird results when performing range filtering
using the sort key field. For example:
ifp_sortkey_ls:["youth culture" TO "youth cultur
I have used two different ways:
1) Store mapping from users to documents in some external database
such as MySQL. At search time, lookup mapping for user to some unique
doc ID or some group ID, and then build query or doc set which you can
cache in SOLR process for some period. Then use that as
I tested with the version 4.0-2011-11-04_09-29-42.
Ariel
2011/11/17 Erick Erickson
> Hmmm, I'm not seeing similar behavior on a trunk from today, when did
> you get your copy?
>
> Erick
>
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Ariel Zerbib
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > For this term proximity query: a
Thanks a lot Erick for this explanation. Do you mean words are stored in
bytes, that's it ?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-dismax-scoring-and-weight-tp3490096p3531917.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
: Which answers my query needs. BUT, my boost function actually changes some
: of the results to be of score 0, which I want to be excluded from the
: result set.
Ok .. so the crux of the issue is that your boost function results in a
value of 0 for some documents, and you would like those docum
I'll have to defer that to one of the sharding experts.
Best
Erick
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 1:28 PM, mechravi25 wrote:
> Hi Erick,
>
> Thanks for your reply. I would know all the options that can be given under
> the defaults section and how they can be overridden. is there any
> documentatio
One subtlety to note is that caching is messed up by this form
since NOW evaluates to the second, and submitting two
successive queries exactly like this won't re-use the cache. On
a query like this it may not matter unless you're paging
But on filter queries, its a good habit to cultivate to
The first thing I'd do is go over to the server and
try using the admin interface to query on *:*. If that
returns nothing, look at the admin/schema browser page
and see what's in your fields, if anything. Then go back
to SolrJ and work on the query part sans the indexing
part once you're sure you
Whether three shards will give you adequate throughput is not an
answerable question. Here's what I suggest. Get a single box
of the size you expect your servers to be and index 1/3 of your
documents on it. Run stress tests. That's really the only way to
be fairly sure your hardware is adequate.
A
Solr 3.3.0
I have a field/type indexed as below.
For a particular document the content of this field is
'FreeBSD,Perl,Linux,Unix,SQL,MySQL,Exim,Postgresql,Apache,Exim'
Using eDismax, mm=1
When I query for...
+perl +(apache sql) +(linux unix)
Strangely, the highlighting is being returned as
I am having a problem with jdk logging with Solr, using the jetty
included with Solr.
In jetty.xml, I have the following defined:
java.util.logging.config.file
etc/logging.properties
Contents of etc/logging.properties:
==
# Logging level
.level=WARNING
# Write to a file
handlers = java.
If you request 1000 docs from each shard, then aggregator is really
fetching 30,000 total documents, which then it must merge (re-sort
results, and take top 1000 to return to client). Its possible that
SOLR merging implementation needs optimized, but it does not seem like
it could be that slow. H
> is this is the trunk of solr 4.0 ,
> can't i implement in solr 3.1 .?
Author of the patch would know answer to this. But why not use trunk?
> If the response time from each shard shows decent figures, then aggregator>
> seems to be a bottleneck. Do you btw have a lot of concurrent users?For now
> is not a problem, but we expect from 1K to 10K of concurrent users and maybe
> more
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Dmitry Kan wrote:
>
Hi,
yes, see http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DistributedSearch
Regards
Vadim
2011/11/2 Val Minyaylo
> Have you tried to query multiple cores at same time?
>
>
> On 10/31/2011 8:30 AM, Vadim Kisselmann wrote:
>
>> it works.
>> it was one wrong placed backslash in my config;)
>> sharing the config/sc
If the response time from each shard shows decent figures, then aggregator
seems to be a bottleneck. Do you btw have a lot of concurrent users?
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Artem Lokotosh wrote:
> > Is this log from the frontend SOLR (aggregator) or from a shard?
> from aggregator
>
> > Can
Thanks for your answer Nagendra,
The problem is i want to do some infix searches. When i search for "sisco" i
want the autocomplete with "san fran*sisco*". In the example you gave me
it's also not possible.
Roy
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Autocomplete-ter
Sure... if you're using the "lucene" query parser and put a ~ after every term
in the query :)
But that would mean that either the users or your application do this.
Erik
On Nov 23, 2011, at 09:03 , meghana wrote:
> Hi Erik,
>
> Thanks for your reply. i come to know that Lucene pro
> Is this log from the frontend SOLR (aggregator) or from a shard?
from aggregator
> Can you merge, e.g. 3 shards together or is it much effort for your team?
Yes, we can merge. We'll try to do this and review how it will works
Thanks, Dmitry
Any another ideas?
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 4:01 PM, D
Yeah, and actually later I've found someone mentioned that
they had done some benchmarks and found that replication
is faster than collection distribution.
Thanks
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Mark Miller wrote:
>
> On Oct 27, 2011, at 2:57 PM, Alireza Salimi wrote:
>
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > If
is this is the trunk of solr 4.0 , can't i implement in solr 3.1 .?
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 7:23 PM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
> > After this i tried with solr3.1-src.
> > Please suggest what should i do ?
>
> Please use solr-trunk.
> svn checkout http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/trunk
>
> I have configured spellchecker component in my solr. it
> works with custom
> request handler (however its not working with standard
> request handler , but
> this is not concern at now) . but its returning suggestions
> for the matching
> spells, instead of it we want that we can directly get
>
TWIMC:
I creating a custom UpdateRequestProcessor chain, where I need to commit
records to a database once the import process has completed.
I'm assuming the processCommit method is called for each
UpdateRequestProcessor chain class when the records are being commited to
the Lucene index.
I'm de
On 11/23/2011 5:21 AM, Chantal Ackermann wrote:
Hi Yavar,
my experience with similar problems was that there was something wrong
with the database connection or the database.
Chantal
It's also possible that your JDBC driver might be trying to buffer the
entire result set. There's a link on
On Nov 22, 2011, at 1:31 PM, mechravi25 wrote:
> Can you please suggest the definition of the terms component for the
> underlying shard cores.
If you look at my earlier email, you will see the limit is set in "invariants"
rather than defaults. This makes it so the param cannot be dynamically
Hi Erik,
Thanks for your reply. i come to know that Lucene provides the fuzzy
search by applying tilde("~") symbol at the end of search with like
delll~0.8
can we apply such fuzzy logic in solr in any way?
Thanks
Meghana
Erik Hatcher-4 wrote
>
> Meghana -
>
> There's currently no facility
On Oct 27, 2011, at 2:57 PM, Alireza Salimi wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> If we ignore the features that Replication provides (
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrReplication#Features),
> which approach is better?
> Is there any performance problems with Replication?
>
> Replications seems quite easier
Hello,
Is this log from the frontend SOLR (aggregator) or from a shard?
Can you merge, e.g. 3 shards together or is it much effort for your team?
In our setup we currently have 16 shards with ~30GB each, but we rarely
search in all of them at once.
Best,
Dmitry
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 3:12 PM,
On 11/22/2011 11:52 PM, Husain, Yavar wrote:
Hi Shawn
That was so great of you to explain the architecture in such a detail. I
enjoyed reading it multiple times.
I have a question here:
You mentioned that we can use crc32(DocumentId)% NumServers. Now actually I am
using that in my data-confi
> After this i tried with solr3.1-src.
> Please suggest what should i do ?
Please use solr-trunk.
svn checkout http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/trunk
Yes, it should be ok, as currently we are on the English side. If that's
beneficial for the effort, I could do a field test on 3.4 after you close
the jira.
Best,
Dmitry
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> Ah, I see what you're doing, go for it.
>
> I intend to commit it tod
Meghana -
Some important points about q/fq -
* q is used for scoring. fq is for filtering, no scoring.
* fq and q are cached independently
You may want to combine the user entered terms (search term, title, and desc)
in the q parameter. It's complicated/advanced, but you can use nested q
Jeff,
Just to clarify - with edismax, q=*:* is fine and matches all documents. With
dismax (and also edismax), q.alt with no q is needed to match all documents.
Erik
On Nov 23, 2011, at 08:20 , Jeff Schmidt wrote:
> Thanks, Erik. I'm moving on to edismax, and will set q.alt=*:* an
Meghana -
There's currently no facility in Solr to return results for suggestions
automatically. You'll have to code this into your client to make another
request to Solr for the suggestions returned from the first request.
Erik
On Nov 23, 2011, at 07:58 , meghana wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I
Thanks, Erik. I'm moving on to edismax, and will set q.alt=*:* and not specify
q if no user provided terms.
Take it easy,
Jeff
On Nov 22, 2011, at 11:53 AM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
> I think you're using dismax, not edismax. edismax will take q=*:* just fine
> as it handles all Lucene syntax que
Hi!
* Data:
- Solr 3.4;
- 30 shards ~ 13GB, 27-29M docs each shard.
* Machine parameters (Ubuntu 10.04 LTS):
user@Solr:~$ uname -a
Linux Solr 2.6.32-31-server #61-Ubuntu SMP Fri Apr 8 19:44:42 UTC 2011
x86_64 GNU/Linux
user@Solr:~$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0 - 3
vendor_id : Genui
Hi,
I have configured spellchecker component in my solr. it works with custom
request handler (however its not working with standard request handler , but
this is not concern at now) . but its returning suggestions for the matching
spells, instead of it we want that we can directly get result for
Ah, I see what you're doing, go for it.
I intend to commit it today, but things happen.
About changing the setLowerCaseExpandedTerms(true), yes
that'll take care of this issue, although it has some
locale-specific assumptions (i.e. string.toLowerCase() uses the
default locale). That may not m
Hi Erik ,
Actually right now we can say that almost is done in filtering and passing q
as *:* , but we need to find out a better way if there is any. So according
to pravesh , i m thinking of to pass user entered text in query and date and
other fields in filter query? or as per you q=*:* is fast
I have configured specllchecker component in my solrconfig
below is the configuration
false
false
1
spellcheck
using above configuration it works with below url
http://192.168.1.59:8080/solr/core0/spellcheck?q=sc:directry&spel
Hi Yavar,
my experience with similar problems was that there was something wrong
with the database connection or the database.
Chantal
On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 11:57 +0100, Husain, Yavar wrote:
> I am using Solr 1.4.1 on Windows/MS SQL Server and am using DIH for importing
> data. Indexing and al
Do you mean stemming?
For misspelled words you will have to edit your dictionary (stopwords.txt)
i think where you can set solution for misspelled words!
Hope So :)
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Search-for-misspelled-search-term-tp3529961p3530504.html
S
Another newbie question here
Browse handler works perfect. Now I want to configure my "/select" handler
so that I perform ajax-solr on it.
How to perform it. The website
https://github.com/evolvingweb/ajax-solr
https://github.com/evolvingweb/ajax-solr
explains how to perform it. I
what i got is the number of this period but i want to get this result only,
what is the query to can get that like
fq=source:"news"
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/date-range-in-solr-3-1-tp3527498p3530424.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at
you probably wanted to query this:
q=profileId:"99964" OR profileId:"10076" OR tagName:("MUSIC" AND "DESIGNER")
otherwise SOLR matches "DESIGNER" against you default field (whatever it
is) and ANDs it with tagName:"MUSIC"
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 11:07 AM, sivaprasad wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have two
I am using Solr 1.4.1 on Windows/MS SQL Server and am using DIH for importing
data. Indexing and all was working perfectly fine. However today when I started
full indexing again, Solr halts/stucks at the line "Creating a connection for
entity." There are no further messages after that.
After this i tried with solr3.1-src.
- and this time i got the core folder in the previous installation ,when
this folder get created
-
/home/reach121/basf/*apache-solr-3.1.0/core/src/test/org/apache/solr/search/TestSurroundQueryParser.java
*
- and i have putted * *
- but when
Hi,
I have two indexed fields called profileId and tagName.When i issue a query
like q=profileId:"99964" OR profileId:"10076" OR tagName:"MUSIC" AND
"DESIGNER", i am getting only the results for tagName:"MUSIC" AND
"DESIGNER".The results are not containing profileId 99964 and 10076.
Can anybody t
Indeed, I can not see any of the 3 images here :
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrReplication#Admin_Page_for_Replication
It just displays the name of image file, as the img url seem to point to
a logged-only link such as this one :
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrReplication?action=AttachFile&do=ge
Hi
I have a query where i sort by a column "price". This field can contain the
following values
10
75000
15
1
225000
50
40
I want to sort these values so that always between 0 and 100 always comes
last.
Eg sorting by price asc should look like this:
75000
10
15
225000
1
40
50
I
i works now
great thanks for you :)
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/date-range-in-solr-3-1-tp3527498p3530038.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I've been read much about Document Level Security
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1895
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1872
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1834
But I not fully sure that these patch solved my problem?
It seems to that change the original document A
65 matches
Mail list logo
