cvs commit: xml-soap/java/src/org/apache/soap/server DefaultConfigManager.java ServiceManager.java XMLConfigManager.java

2003-06-23 Thread snichol
snichol 2003/06/20 22:24:08 Modified:java/src/org/apache/soap/server DefaultConfigManager.java ServiceManager.java XMLConfigManager.java Log: Distinguish between the inability to open a config file ("assume fresh start") and the inability to read its content

Base64 --> Base64Serializer - Why?

2003-06-23 Thread Richard Bolen
I recently tried upgrading to the latest nightly build of SOAP (June 20, 2003) from 2.2. I needed this to support HTTPS over a proxy server. The problem I had was that it suddenly started using a different SOAP serializer type for byte[] content (Base64Serializer instead of Base64). I had to chan

RE: Base64 --> Base64Serializer - Why?

2003-06-23 Thread Richard Bolen
Perhaps more to the point is what the xsi:type attribute is set to for the byte[] element I'm trying to send: SOAP 2.2: http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/"; xsi:type="ns2:base64"> SOAP 2.3.1 June 20 Nightly Build: Can I force it to use the old ns2:base64 type? -Original Message

RE: Base64 --> Base64Serializer - Why?

2003-06-23 Thread Scott Nichol
History: When Apache SOAP (actually, IBM SOAP4J) started, it was based on the SOAP and XML Schema specs of the day. Since XML Schema did not define a type for Base64 encoded data, the SOAP spec defined one, and that was the type Apache SOAP used. By Apache SOAP 2.2, there were also 2000 and

RE: Base64 --> Base64Serializer - Why?

2003-06-23 Thread Richard Bolen
Thanks for the detailed explanation. I've set my clients to use the 1999 schema. This seems to work. -Original Message- From: Scott Nichol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 1:45 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Base64 --> Base64Serializer - Why? History: Wh