[PATCH] Simple performance tests

2002-11-04 Thread Pavel Ausianik
Hello, In discussion of what performance gains we got, I created a very simple performance test, basing on existing addressbook sample (files attached should be added to java\samples\addressbook\ dir, sorry not sure how correct patch should be created for new files). The test allow to run getAddr

RE: [PATCH] Simple performance tests

2002-11-04 Thread Pavel Ausianik
Seems like cmd was blocked Now all files zipped > -Original Message- > From: Pavel Ausianik [mailto:Pavel_Ausianik@;epam.com] > Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 7:30 PM > To: 'Scott Nichol'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: [PATCH] Simple performance tests > > > Hello, > > In discussion o

Re: [PATCH] Simple performance tests

2002-11-04 Thread Scott Nichol
Pavel, Thanks again. I am adding your new files to CVS, although I have made one change. When I ran the test on my uniprocessor machine, I fell straight through this code on the first loop: /// Waiting all requests to finish while (numberRequests > 0) { Thread.currentThrea

cvs commit: xml-soap/java/samples/addressbook ComplexRequest.java perftest.cmd perftest.sh

2002-11-04 Thread snichol
snichol 2002/11/04 11:05:53 Added: java/samples/addressbook ComplexRequest.java perftest.cmd perftest.sh Log: Submitted by: Pavel Ausianik ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) In discussion of what performance gains we got, I created a very simple performance test, ba

RE: [PATCH] Simple performance tests

2002-11-04 Thread Pavel Ausianik
Scott, your code is definetly better, I have to learn threads usage little more. Thanks, Pavel > -Original Message- > From: Scott Nichol [mailto:snicholnews@;scottnichol.com] > Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 9:06 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [PATCH] Simple performance tests