Re: Problems with Serializers/Deserializers

Todd, If you can post the code to this list, someone may be able to track down the problem. Scott Nichol - Original Message - From: "Todd D. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, June 09, 2002 8:06 PM Subject: Problems with Serializers/Deserializers > I am

RE: Problems with Serializers/Deserializers

Todd, Place than also the definition for the deploiment. We all can have a look. Question: Are you using xerces? if so, which version? Greetz, Henk Schipper. -Original Message- From: Scott Nichol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 10 June, 2002 4:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subje

ANNOUNCE: Apache SOAP v2.3.1 posted...

Hi Folks, Due to a significant interoperability bug, we just posted a new release (at http://xml.apache.org/soap/). The bug was: the xsi:null attribute was still being used with the 2001 Schema namespaces, instead of the xsi:nil attribute which is specified. Thanks, The Apache SOAP team...

VOTE: Scott Nichol for committer

I'd like to nominate Scott for committer status. He has been one of the most consistent contributors to this project, but for some reason we neglected to make him a committer. Scott is also a frequest contributor to soap-user. Please vote with your +1! Here's mine: +1. Sanjiva.

RE: VOTE: Scott Nichol for committer

+1 -Original Message- From: Sanjiva Weerawarana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 10:31 AM To: Apache SOAP Subject: VOTE: Scott Nichol for committer I'd like to nominate Scott for committer status. He has been one of the most consistent contributors to this project

RE: VOTE: Scott Nichol for committer

+1 -Original Message- From: ANNAREDDY,REDDY (HP-Cupertino,ex1) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 12:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: VOTE: Scott Nichol for committer +1 -Original Message- From: Sanjiva Weerawarana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Mo

Problems with (De)Serializers w/ Code

I have attached code samples to the bottom. I am resending bc I did not see my earlier message show up on the archives. I am using the following environment java 1.4 Tomcat 4.0.3 Soap 2.3 Xerces 1.4.4 I have written a simple class that implements not only the cla

RE: Problems with Serializers/Deserializers

I apologize for teh duplicate post (typing error)... Xerces tends to be a growing problem on my system. It seems every piece of software I install these days installs a newer version of xerces. I am, however, pointing to xerces 1.4.4 in the classpath in the tomcat script (and have verified that

RE: Problems with Serializers/Deserializers

Xerces tends to be a growing problem on my system. It seems every piece of software I install these days installs a newer version of xerces. I am, however, pointing to xerces 1.4.4 in the classpath in the tomcat script (and have verified that xerces is not in my jre ext dir). I attached the --

RE: Problems with Serializers/Deserializers

I've now attached the code. I've also read that this might be a classloader or xml parser issue. Any help would be great. thanks > I am using the following environment > java 1.4 > Tomcat 4.0.3 > Soap 2.3 > > I have written a simple class that implements not only the class functions, > but t

Re: VOTE: Scott Nichol for committer

+1 Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote: > I'd like to nominate Scott for committer status. He has been > one of the most consistent contributors to this project, but > for some reason we neglected to make him a committer. Scott > is also a frequest contributor to soap-user. > > Please vote with your +1! >

RE: VOTE: Scott Nichol for committer

Title: RE: VOTE: Scott Nichol for committer +1 -Original Message- From: Andrew Trieger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 12:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: VOTE: Scott Nichol for committer +1 Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote: > I'd like to nominate Scott

RE: VOTE: Scott Nichol for committer

+1 > -Original Message- > From: Gaur, Deepak [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 2:57 PM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: RE: VOTE: Scott Nichol for committer > > +1 > > -Original Message- > From: Andrew Trieger [ ] > S

ANNOUNCE: Apache SOAP v2.3.1 posted...

Hi Folks, Due to a significant interoperability bug, we just posted a new release (at http://xml.apache.org/soap/). The bug was: the xsi:null attribute was still being used with the 2001 Schema namespaces, instead of the xsi:nil attribute which is specified. Thanks, The Apache SOAP team...

RE: VOTE: Scott Nichol for committer

+1 >From: "Sahoo, Ajaya (GMI, CSSD)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: RE: VOTE: Scott Nichol for committer >Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 15:00:42 -0400 > > +1 > > > -Original Message- > > From: Gaur, Deepak [SMTP:[

Re: Problems with (De)Serializers w/ Code

Todd, You basically figured this out yourself: Another question: the only reference to the class GuideSerializer that is made is at the client while building the call. Is this correct? Do I need to somehow map GuideSerializer to the type Guide in the DeploymentDescriptor??? If, as y

RE: Problems with (De)Serializers w/ Code

Hey, thanks so much for your help. I think I just needed someone to lay it out for me. I have, however come across some questions: What is the deal with WSDL? I noticed that the AddressBook2 sample has a .wsdl file in the sample directory, but nothing seems to really reference it. How do you

Re: Problems with (De)Serializers w/ Code

> What is the deal with WSDL? I noticed that the AddressBook2 sample has a > .wsdl file in the sample directory, but nothing seems to really reference > it. How do you lock an object or service to a WSDL file? Does apache soap > not really support .wsdl (and axis does?) Frankly, I do not know

RE: VOTE: Scott Nichol for committer

+1 -Original Message- From: atrieger [mailto:atrieger]On Behalf Of Andrew Trieger Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 12:25 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: VOTE: Scott Nichol for committer +1 Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote: > I'd like to nominate Scott for committer status. He has been > on

Re: Problems with (De)Serializers w/ Code

I put that WSDL in there as I generated the addressbook2 client using a WSDL stub generator (our own old WSDL Toolkit if I recall). I agree we should take it out from there as Apache SOAP doesn't do any WSDL stuff! Sanjiva. - Original Message - From: "Scott Nichol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To

RE: VOTE: Scott Nichol for committer

+1 Scott, is also a leading contributor in answering queries to those folks who need immediate help in SOAP. I am all for nominating Scott to the committer list. Congrats! scott. Nilesh -Original Message- From: nitesh gautam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002