Re: Problems with (De)Serializers w/ Code

2002-06-10 Thread Sanjiva Weerawarana
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 4:03 AM Subject: Re: Problems with (De)Serializers w/ Code > > What is the deal with WSDL? I noticed that the AddressBook2 sample has a > > .wsdl file in the sample directory, but nothing seems to reall

Re: Problems with (De)Serializers w/ Code

2002-06-10 Thread Scott Nichol
> What is the deal with WSDL? I noticed that the AddressBook2 sample has a > .wsdl file in the sample directory, but nothing seems to really reference > it. How do you lock an object or service to a WSDL file? Does apache soap > not really support .wsdl (and axis does?) Frankly, I do not know

RE: Problems with (De)Serializers w/ Code

2002-06-10 Thread Todd D. Johnson
lock an object or service to a WSDL file? Does apache soap not really support .wsdl (and axis does?) Again, thank you so much Todd -Original Message- From: Scott Nichol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 4:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Problems with (De

Re: Problems with (De)Serializers w/ Code

2002-06-10 Thread Scott Nichol
Todd, You basically figured this out yourself: Another question: the only reference to the class GuideSerializer that is made is at the client while building the call. Is this correct? Do I need to somehow map GuideSerializer to the type Guide in the DeploymentDescriptor??? If, as y