RE: calling stateless EJB via SOAP

2001-08-29 Thread Gerry Woods
t 29, 2001 10:51 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: calling stateless EJB via SOAP I have most certainly got the EJB working through SOAP, just not JBOSS, sorry. :) -- Jared "Cook, Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 08/29/2001 12:23:57 PM Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: calling stateless EJB via SOAP

2001-08-29 Thread Jared P Jurkiewicz
I have most certainly got the EJB working through SOAP, just not JBOSS, sorry. :) -- Jared "Cook, Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 08/29/2001 12:23:57 PM Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: Subject: R

RE: calling stateless EJB via SOAP

2001-08-29 Thread Matt Barnes
PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: calling stateless EJB via SOAP   Thanks for taking the time to reply, Jared. I added my EJB jar file to the classpath, but it doesn't seem to make any difference. I do agree with you, in that I also believe that my problem is related to a classpath issue, but I'

Re: calling stateless EJB via SOAP

2001-08-29 Thread Cook, Martin
ged to get Apache to serve up an EJB through SOAP? Specifically, and EJB running on JBOSS? -Original Message- From: Jared P Jurkiewicz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 11:36 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: calling stateless EJB via SOAP The classpath that

RE: calling stateless EJB via SOAP

2001-08-29 Thread Cook, Martin
ged to get Apache to serve up an EJB through SOAP? Specifically, and EJB running on JBOSS? -Original Message- From: Jared P Jurkiewicz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 11:36 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: calling stateless EJB via SOAP The classpath that

Re: calling stateless EJB via SOAP

2001-08-28 Thread Jared P Jurkiewicz
The classpath that SOAP is on doesn't contain the EJB classes, so it's not finding the home interface class to load and invoke. You need to add your EJB jar to the classpaht SAOP sees, I believe. -- Jared "Cook, Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 08/28/2001 11:51:51 AM Please respond to [EMAIL PR