On Friday 22 November 2002 09:53, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> On Thursday 21 November 2002 22:51, Scott Nichol wrote:
> > Niclas,
> >
> > What version of Apache SOAP will you be starting with? The use of JDK
> > 1.2 features has accelerated over the last 4-6 weeks. As you guessed,
> > this is mostly
On Thursday 21 November 2002 22:51, Scott Nichol wrote:
> Niclas,
>
> What version of Apache SOAP will you be starting with? The use of JDK
> 1.2 features has accelerated over the last 4-6 weeks. As you guessed,
> this is mostly collection classes. Fortunately, the changes are limited
> to imple
ginal Message -
From: "Niclas Hedhman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 10:04 PM
Subject: Re: Question about JDK 1.1
On Wednesday 20 November 2002 12:38, Scott Nichol wrote:
> I believe 2.2 worked with JDK 1.1, and I think
On Wednesday 20 November 2002 12:38, Scott Nichol wrote:
> I believe 2.2 worked with JDK 1.1, and I think you'll find that 2.3.1 is
> at least mostly compatible (maybe some serializer does not work, but
> most of the code should). Of course, this assumes the required
> supporting jars, such as Jav
I believe 2.2 worked with JDK 1.1, and I think you'll find that 2.3.1 is
at least mostly compatible (maybe some serializer does not work, but
most of the code should). Of course, this assumes the required
supporting jars, such as JavaMail and JAF work with JDK 1.1, too.
Scott Nichol
- Origin
Scott,
agree, please find a patch
Pavel
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Nichol [mailto:snicholnews@;scottnichol.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 10:17 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Question: MimeType usage
>
>
> From your description, I gu
>From your description, I guess you have traced into
MimeType#match(String) to see that it instantiates a MimeType so it can
call MimeType#match(MimeType), right? If that is the case, it seems to
me that something that will speed execution without worrying about the
actual logic in the call is to
Schema validation in Web services remains rare. In .NET, for example,
one cannot enable validation by simply setting an attribute or making a
method call, which means that virtually no one using .NET is validating.
I don't know how many Apache SOAP users enable validation, but I don't
think it is
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2002 7:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Question: Does SOAP support call-back?
In theory, establishing connections and keeping them alive is possible.
In
practice, this would take some maneuvering to work with HTTP as the
transport. Since Apache SOAP
My question is it possible for me to have a SOAP call back without
setting up a web application server at the client-side?
In the sense that you can have a SOAP server without a web app server, yes.
Apache SOAP, however, requires an app server to receive SOAP RPC calls.
Scott Nichol
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Question: Does SOAP support call-back?
It does not support call back in a way like RMI.
SOAP lacks many capabilities that RMI has. The SOAP 1.1 spec lists in
Design Goals the following things that SOAP does *not* do:
a.. Distributed garbage collection
b.. Boxcarring or
It does not support call back in a way like RMI.
SOAP lacks many capabilities that RMI has. The SOAP 1.1 spec lists in
Design Goals the following things that SOAP does *not* do:
a.. Distributed garbage collection
b.. Boxcarring or batching of messages
c.. Objects-by-reference (which requi
Ed,
The response from a SOAP RPC call needs to be a single value, although that
value can be a complex type. Therefore, only 1 element can be a direct
descendant of the SetPersonResponse element. If the type you want to return is
the composition of NodeA and NodeB, you must have an element cont
I have not experienced a similar problem, but I have an observation. When you
run under Tomcat 4.x, your Apache SOAP code will use the versions of Xerces,
JavaMail and JAF that are bundled with Tomcat. Under Tomcat 3.x, your Tomcat
startup script had to be changed to point to versions of those j
Got also another one. Are you using xerces version 1.3.1?
1.3.1 is buggy. 1.3.0 is good working.
Greetz,
Henk.
-Original Message-
From: William Brogden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, 22 March, 2002 4:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Question
> -Origi
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Wang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 3:57 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Question
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I am a new developer on SOAP2.2.
> I got a question when I tried to deploy the sample service to
> rpcrouter.
> Wh
When i first started on the servers, i got the same errors.
Please check the configuration for xerces and soap (also tomcat-startup
sequence).
Check the classpath,
check the server.xml
check if you have the jar-files
Regards,
Henk.
-Original Message-
From: Peter Wang [mailto:[EMAIL PRO
Dan Davis wrote:
> I'm aware of Axis, GLUE, and WASP through the archives,
> but has anybody explored more radical ways to improve
> performance?
hi Dan,
we attempted a much more radical approach to SOAP processing by focusing on
streaming deserialization and pipelined architecture - then of co
18 matches
Mail list logo
