more
flexible.
Cheers,
==>Lancer---
> -Original Message-
> From: Michele Costabile [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2001 3:39 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Client Code generator ..
>
>
> > Hen, not to d
Message-
From: Michele Costabile [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 12 July 2001 11:39
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Client Code generator ..
> Hen, not to discourage since what I am working on is vapor since it hasn't
> been released, but I am porting a WSDL2 Axis
lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2001 6:38 AM
Subject: Re: Client Code generator ..
> > Hen, not to discourage since what I am working on is vapor since it
hasn't
> > been released, but I am porting a WSDL2 Axis Client proxy (from another
>
> Hen, not to discourage since what I am working on is vapor since it hasn't
> been released, but I am porting a WSDL2 Axis Client proxy (from another
> source base) which I hope to have working with primitive types by the end
of
> the week (and damn that end is coming up fast :-().
I would be ve
#x27;;
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Client Code generator ..
>
>
> Lance, correct me if I'm wrong, but you are working on WSDL2Java
> functionality only, correct? (i.e. given a WSDL document,
> generate Java
> proxies.)
>
> As I read Henner's messa
t; -Original Message-
>> From: Henner Zeller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 7:03 AM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Client Code generator ..
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>> I am in the pr
is is just an FYI. Now I had better get back to coding.
Cheers,
==>Lancer---
> -Original Message-
> From: Henner Zeller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 7:03 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Client Code generator ..
&
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 10:03 AM
Subject: Client Code generator ..
>
> Hi,
> I am in the process of evaluating the apache soap effort and am interested
> in contributing to it, since I think a feature complete, fast and stable
> SOAP implementation is as i
Hi,
I am in the process of evaluating the apache soap effort and am interested
in contributing to it, since I think a feature complete, fast and stable
SOAP implementation is as important for the near future as e.g. tomcat
already is. I don't know yet, where I should spend my resources, however:
