Scott,
Thank you for you big work for submitting this all staff. Comparing my
sources with cvs, I agree that only change left is SOAPMappingRegistry (only
optimizes startup) + DeploymentDescriptor + ComplexRequest from examples.
However after XMLMappingREgistry was changed to do not use string k
On Wednesday 20 November 2002 12:38, Scott Nichol wrote:
> I believe 2.2 worked with JDK 1.1, and I think you'll find that 2.3.1 is
> at least mostly compatible (maybe some serializer does not work, but
> most of the code should). Of course, this assumes the required
> supporting jars, such as Jav
snichol 2002/11/20 14:27:10
Modified:java/samples/doclit Add.java
java/src/org/apache/soap/rpc Call.java
Log:
Remove get/setDocLitSerialization from Call. Clients should just set
this directly on SOAPContext.
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +1 -1 xml
Pavel,
I committed this code for now.
I believe the only outstanding patch submission from you is
SOAPMappingRegistry. I know it's hard to believe, but I will get to it
eventually!
Thanks for all the work on the MIME stuff. It is a great performance
boost.
Scott Nichol
- Original Message
snichol 2002/11/20 13:54:25
Modified:java/src/org/apache/soap/rpc Call.java
java/src/org/apache/soap/server/http RPCRouterServlet.java
java/src/org/apache/soap/util/xml XMLParserUtils.java
Log:
Submitted by: Pavel Ausianik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Please
snichol 2002/11/20 13:34:43
Modified:java/src/org/apache/soap/providers RPCJavaProvider.java
java/src/org/apache/soap/rpc Call.java SOAPContext.java
java/src/org/apache/soap/server ServerUtils.java
java/src/org/apache/soap/server/http RPCRoute
I am certainly not a CVS expert. It appears that cvs diff compares your
current code to the last version you grabbed unless you specify -r with
another version specified. So, if you check what version is the latest
in CVS, you can diff against it using -r. Personally, I do something
similar to w
Scott,
sorry, what is correct algorithm for working with CVS? I made some changes,
collect patch, send it to cvs. Than I run cvs checkout again, but my files
not updates. Only known solution I know is to move old src tree, get
completely new on, compare changes, put updated files, send collect pa
Pavel,
I could not use patch on these patches, apparently because they are done
against older CVS versions. I need the diffs against the current CVS
sources. Also, please send diffs for all 5 files (SOAPContext, Call,
TransportMessage, RPCJavaProvider, RPCRouterServlet).
Thanks.
Scott Nichol
Thanks.
The error you still see existed before your change, so don't worry about
it.
Scott Nichol
- Original Message -
From: "Pavel Ausianik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 6:09 AM
Subject: RE: Using mime parts - huge drawbacks
> Scott,
>
Scott,
It seems like two bugs fixed.
One is related to missed fillRootPart() in SOAPContext.writeTo()
Second is relates on how content type identified in case envelope is set
Attaching a patch against current cvs
During mime test execution I had one error related to SOAP registry
Generated fa
looking, see problem...
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Nichol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 8:26 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Using mime parts - huge drawbacks
>
>
> Pavel,
>
> I applied these patches, but the mime sample does not work.
snichol 2002/11/19 23:56:02
Modified:java/samples/interop EchoTestClient.java
Log:
Add type mappings for a element. I don't know whether the round 2
WSDL has changed or some implementers are changing their round 2 endpoints
according to WSDL for later rounds, but several implem
13 matches
Mail list logo
