Re: Request for etcdctl alias autoconnect

2017-03-27 Thread Jamie Strandboge
On Sat, 2017-03-25 at 16:10 -0300, Gustavo Niemeyer wrote: > Sounds sane. > > Bret, Natalia, who's the best person to handle such requests after > approval?  I know Jamie can edit the declarations, so he could easily do > it, but that's not entirely security related. Should we just abuse ask > whe

[Fwd: Re: Request for etcdctl alias autoconnect]

2017-03-27 Thread Jamie Strandboge
This got caught up in an issue with the mailing list server and never made it to the list. Resending now-- sorry for the delay in response to the list. Forwarded Message From: Jamie Strandboge To: Mark Shuttleworth Cc: Snapcraft Subject: Re: Request for etcdctl alias

Re: Request for etcdctl alias autoconnect

2017-03-25 Thread Gustavo Niemeyer
Sounds sane. Bret, Natalia, who's the best person to handle such requests after approval? I know Jamie can edit the declarations, so he could easily do it, but that's not entirely security related. Should we just abuse ask whether Jamie would mind to handle those requests for now or is there a be

Re: Request for etcdctl alias autoconnect

2017-03-06 Thread Charles Butler
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 11:44 AM Jamie Strandboge wrote: > On Mon, 2017-03-06 at 17:26 +, Charles Butler wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > I think this in itself would be preferable. My concerns would be > collision > > while the deb is still installed which is a short window in the charm > path.

Re: Request for etcdctl alias autoconnect

2017-03-06 Thread Charles Butler
Greetings, I think this in itself would be preferable. My concerns would be collision while the deb is still installed which is a short window in the charm path. I think `snap alias etcd.etcdctl etcdctl` is the desired outcome here, so we aren't changing commands. I've worked around this in the