Re: Please test my asciinema snap

2017-01-31 Thread Sergio Schvezov
To followup here for those not tracking the bug about trusty: https://asciinema.org/a/1bwmj57y51i25afq0ss54q0iz This will be available when using snapcraft 2.27 if no major blocker shows up (two PRs need to land). -- Sent using Dekko from my Ubuntu device -- Snapcraft mailing list Snapcraft@

Re: Please test my asciinema snap

2017-01-24 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On 25 January 2017 at 11:28, Michael Hudson-Doyle < michael.hud...@canonical.com> wrote: > > You have to do this "asciinema rec -c 'PYTHONHOME=/usr python3 > urwid/examples/pop_up.py '" instead (and even that ends up using python3 > from the core snap, not the one I have installed). > More general

Re: Please test my asciinema snap

2017-01-24 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On 25 January 2017 at 11:02, Sergio Schvezov wrote: > On Wed, 25 Jan 2017 08:17:17 +1300, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > > Hm, I was assuming that the PYTHONHOME leaking was due to things in the > > snap specifically (is the source to the snap available?), but are they > set > > by snapd or snap-c

Re: Please test my asciinema snap

2017-01-24 Thread Sergio Schvezov
On Wed, 25 Jan 2017 08:17:17 +1300, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > Hm, I was assuming that the PYTHONHOME leaking was due to things in the > snap specifically (is the source to the snap available?), but are they set > by snapd or snap-confine or something? Might be easier to follow in the bug Dave

Re: Please test my asciinema snap

2017-01-24 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Hm, I was assuming that the PYTHONHOME leaking was due to things in the snap specifically (is the source to the snap available?), but are they set by snapd or snap-confine or something? Cheers, mwh On 24 January 2017 at 00:09, Gustavo Niemeyer wrote: > > I'm wondering if maybe we should simply

Re: Please test my asciinema snap

2017-01-23 Thread Gustavo Niemeyer
I'm wondering if maybe we should simply drop all snapcraft wrappers for classic snaps, specifically. As it is, the amount of magic that is actually intended for strict snaps seems to be hurting the behavior and understanding of classic snaps. I doubt adding even more magic will help. On Mon, Ja

Re: Please test my asciinema snap

2017-01-22 Thread Stuart Bishop
On 20 January 2017 at 19:59, Mark Shuttleworth wrote: > > Any recommendations for dealing with those? > Do exec* and friends need to be patched somehow, so that if processes are spawned from a classic snap with targets outside snapd containment then the environment is cleaned? I think this will

Re: Please test my asciinema snap

2017-01-20 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Any recommendations for dealing with those? On 19/01/17 16:20, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > PYTHONHOME also leaks into the recording environment. > > On 20 January 2017 at 13:03, Michael Hudson-Doyle > mailto:michael.hud...@canonical.com>> > wrote: > > This confused me for a > while: htt

Re: Please test my asciinema snap

2017-01-19 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
PYTHONHOME also leaks into the recording environment. On 20 January 2017 at 13:03, Michael Hudson-Doyle < michael.hud...@canonical.com> wrote: > This confused me for a while: https://asciinema.org/ > a/2ua1d08k6v8jiyy1m2uyvn8rx (spoiler: python3 inside 'asciinema rec' is > python3 from the core s

Re: Please test my asciinema snap

2017-01-19 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
This confused me for a while: https://asciinema.org/a/2ua1d08k6v8jiyy1m2uyvn8rx (spoiler: python3 inside ' asciinema rec' is python3 from the core snap). Cheers, mwh On 18 January 2017 at 22:16, Mark Shuttleworth wrote: > Hi folks > > (For those of you who Gmail does not filter this email on >

Re: Please test my asciinema snap

2017-01-18 Thread Dave Morley
On Wed, 18 Jan 2017 10:47:27 -0500 Mark Shuttleworth wrote: > On 18/01/17 06:41, Dave Morley wrote: > > Not so happy on 14.04 paste.ubuntu.com/23821653/ I get a > > segfault :( > > Can you report a bug and include 'snap --version' please? > > Thank you! > Mark > Done https://bugs.launchpad

Re: Please test my asciinema snap

2017-01-18 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
On 18/01/17 06:41, Dave Morley wrote: > Not so happy on 14.04 paste.ubuntu.com/23821653/ I get a segfault :( Can you report a bug and include 'snap --version' please? Thank you! Mark signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- Snapcraft mailing list Snapcraft@lists.snapcraft.io M

Re: Please test my asciinema snap

2017-01-18 Thread Dave Morley
On Wed, 18 Jan 2017 14:43:30 + Dan Watkins wrote: > On 18/01/17 14:38, Dave Morley wrote: > > https://asciinema.org/a/c7ohu56eupwnq6noyua2k0eum > > https://asciinema.org/a/3ymbowr1pk6usww8v1iyveai9 > https://asciinema.org/a/0o2pajjotf3k9fnv80btm26qx -- You Make It, I'll Break It! I Lo

Re: Please test my asciinema snap

2017-01-18 Thread Dan Watkins
On 18/01/17 14:38, Dave Morley wrote: > https://asciinema.org/a/c7ohu56eupwnq6noyua2k0eum https://asciinema.org/a/3ymbowr1pk6usww8v1iyveai9 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- Snapcraft mailing list Snapcraft@lists.snapcraft.io Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://li

Re: Please test my asciinema snap

2017-01-18 Thread Dave Morley
On Wed, 18 Jan 2017 06:34:26 -0500 Mark Shuttleworth wrote: > On 18/01/17 06:12, Sergio Schvezov wrote: > > On Wed, 18 Jan 2017 10:40:47 +, Jamie Bennett wrote: > >> On 18/01/17 at 04:19am, Mark Shuttleworth wrote: > >>> ... you may also need to enable xenial-proposed main in > >>> /etc/a

Re: Please test my asciinema snap

2017-01-18 Thread Sergio Schvezov
On Wed, 18 Jan 2017 11:41:49 +, Dave Morley wrote: > On Wed, 18 Jan 2017 04:16:45 -0500 > Mark Shuttleworth wrote: > >> Hi folks >> >> (For those of you who Gmail does not filter this email on >> as-yet-unexplained-grounds :)) >> >> Please could you test my asciinema snap? Asciinema is a con

Re: Please test my asciinema snap

2017-01-18 Thread Dave Morley
On Wed, 18 Jan 2017 04:16:45 -0500 Mark Shuttleworth wrote: > Hi folks > > (For those of you who Gmail does not filter this email on > as-yet-unexplained-grounds :)) > > Please could you test my asciinema snap? Asciinema is a console video > recording utility that's great for CLI-diven demos. I

Re: Please test my asciinema snap

2017-01-18 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
On 18/01/17 06:12, Sergio Schvezov wrote: > On Wed, 18 Jan 2017 10:40:47 +, Jamie Bennett wrote: >> On 18/01/17 at 04:19am, Mark Shuttleworth wrote: >>> ... you may also need to enable xenial-proposed main in >>> /etc/apt/sources.list to make sure you have the very latest snapd. >> Yes, classic

Re: Please test my asciinema snap

2017-01-18 Thread Sergio Schvezov
On Wed, 18 Jan 2017 10:40:47 +, Jamie Bennett wrote: > On 18/01/17 at 04:19am, Mark Shuttleworth wrote: >> >> ... you may also need to enable xenial-proposed main in >> /etc/apt/sources.list to make sure you have the very latest snapd. > > Yes, classic needs snapd 2.21 from proposed otherwise

Re: Please test my asciinema snap

2017-01-18 Thread Jamie Bennett
On 18/01/17 at 04:19am, Mark Shuttleworth wrote: > > ... you may also need to enable xenial-proposed main in > /etc/apt/sources.list to make sure you have the very latest snapd. Yes, classic needs snapd 2.21 from proposed otherwise you will not be able to find or install the snap. After that, it

Re: Please test my asciinema snap

2017-01-18 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
... you may also need to enable xenial-proposed main in /etc/apt/sources.list to make sure you have the very latest snapd. Mark On 18/01/17 04:16, Mark Shuttleworth wrote: > It's a 'classic-only' snap, so you need: > > sudo snap install --classic asciinema > > Then 'asciinema rec' starts a rec

Please test my asciinema snap

2017-01-18 Thread Mark Shuttleworth
Hi folks (For those of you who Gmail does not filter this email on as-yet-unexplained-grounds :)) Please could you test my asciinema snap? Asciinema is a console video recording utility that's great for CLI-diven demos. If you want to make a quick web video of a CLI / console journey, asciinema i