Re: [Smartmontools-database] new (old) drive for the database

2014-07-17 Thread Nick Steeves
Christian, thanks for the clarification! Yes, I'm guessing it's a Lenovo variant, which (from what I've read) can't be flashed with Intel's firmware update software, and am hoping that the 8mb 320 is already patched. -- W

Re: [Smartmontools-database] new (old) drive for the database

2014-07-16 Thread Christian Franke
Nick Steeves wrote: > And this is why I'm concerned, output from smartctl -l selftest. #1 > was a long test, and #2 was a short one: > > === START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION === > SMART Self-test log structure revision number 3258 > Warning: ATA Specification requires self-test log structure rev

Re: [Smartmontools-database] new (old) drive for the database

2014-07-14 Thread Nick Steeves
And this is why I'm concerned, output from smartctl -l selftest. #1 was a long test, and #2 was a short one: === START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION === SMART Self-test log structure revision number 3258 Warning: ATA Specification requires self-test log structure revision number = 1 Num Test_Descri

[Smartmontools-database] new (old) drive for the database

2014-07-03 Thread Nick Steeves
Hi, Attached is the "smartctl -q noserial -x" output for the 160GB Intel 320 series SSD that ships with an Lenovo Thinkpad X220. I recently bought one used, and need to know if I should return it while I can. So I'd like to know if it's already worn out, or if the system is otherwise defective.