On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 10:40 PM, Christian Franke
wrote:
> David Rees wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 7:33 AM, Christian Franke
>> wrote:
>>> David Rees wrote:
>>>> Seems to be missing a lot of SMART attributes that the older Indilinx
>>>> d
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 7:33 AM, Christian Franke
wrote:
> David Rees wrote:
>>
>> Seems to be missing a lot of SMART attributes that the older Indilinx
>> drives have. See attached for smartctl -a output.
>
> This device does not use the Indilinx specific format whic
Seems to be missing a lot of SMART attributes that the older Indilinx
drives have. See attached for smartctl -a output.
-Dave
smartctl 5.40 2010-10-16 r3189 [x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu] (local build)
Copyright (C) 2002-10 by Bruce Allen, http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net
=== START OF INFORMATION
It looks like basically the same drive was sent in a couple times
quite some time ago, but I am guessing that the very long device model
may be confusing things.
http://marc.info/?l=smartmontools-database&m=115105605016126&w=2
http://marc.info/?l=smartmontools-database&m=122558939607347&w=2
-Dave
