[slurm-users] errors compiling Slurm 18 on RHEL 9: [Makefile:577: scancel] Error 1 & It's not recommended to have unversioned Obsoletes

We're in the process of upgrading but first we're moving to RHEL 9. My attempt to compile using rpmbuild -v -ta --define "_lto_cflags %{nil}" slurm-18.08.9.tar.bz2 (H/T to Brian for this flag ). I've stumped Google and the Slurm

[slurm-users] Re: errors compiling Slurm 18 on RHEL 9: [Makefile:577: scancel] Error 1 & It's not recommended to have unversioned Obsoletes

Slurm 18? Isn't that a bit outdated? On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 9:41 AM Robert Kudyba via slurm-users < slurm-users@lists.schedmd.com> wrote: > We're in the process of upgrading but first we're moving to RHEL 9. My > attempt to compile using rpmbuild -v -ta --define "_lto_cflags %{nil}" > slurm-18.

[slurm-users] Re: SLUG'24 presentation slides?

Awesome, thanks Victoria! Cheers, -- Kilian On Thu, Sep 26, 2024 at 11:17 AM Victoria Hobson wrote: > Hi Kilian, > > We're getting these posted now and an email will go out when they are > available! > > Thanks, > > > Victoria Hobson > > *Vice President of Marketing * > > 909.609.8889 > > www.s

[slurm-users] Re: errors compiling Slurm 18 on RHEL 9: [Makefile:577: scancel] Error 1 & It's not recommended to have unversioned Obsoletes

Totally. That's why we are upgrading. We were recommended by SchedMD to update the OS first, then Slurm. So as we are testing RHEL 9 we are hitting this roadblock. On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 12:12 PM Davide DelVento wrote: > Slurm 18? Isn't that a bit outdated? > > On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 9:41 AM R