Hi,
is it possible to have slurm scheduling jobs automatical according to
the "-t" time requirements to a fitting partition?
e.g. 3 partitions
PartitionName=standard Nodes=c-[01-10] Default=YES MaxTime=04:00:00
DefaultTime=00:10:00 State=UP OverSubscribe=NO
PartitionName=medium Nodes=c-[04-0
Hi Dietmar,
Dietmar Rieder via slurm-users writes:
> Hi,
>
> is it possible to have slurm scheduling jobs automatical according to
> the "-t" time requirements to a fitting partition?
>
> e.g. 3 partitions
>
> PartitionName=standard Nodes=c-[01-10] Default=YES MaxTime=04:00:00
> DefaultTime=00:1
Hi Loris,
On 4/30/24 2:53 PM, Loris Bennett via slurm-users wrote:
Hi Dietmar,
Dietmar Rieder via slurm-users writes:
Hi,
is it possible to have slurm scheduling jobs automatical according to
the "-t" time requirements to a fitting partition?
e.g. 3 partitions
PartitionName=standard Nodes
Try adding to the config:
EnforcePartLimits=ANY
JobSubmitPlugins=all_partitions
Diego
Il 30/04/2024 15:11, Dietmar Rieder via slurm-users ha scritto:
Hi Loris,
On 4/30/24 2:53 PM, Loris Bennett via slurm-users wrote:
Hi Dietmar,
Dietmar Rieder via slurm-users writes:
Hi,
is it possible t
Hi Dietmar,
Dietmar Rieder via slurm-users writes:
> Hi Loris,
>
> On 4/30/24 2:53 PM, Loris Bennett via slurm-users wrote:
>> Hi Dietmar,
>> Dietmar Rieder via slurm-users
>> writes:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> is it possible to have slurm scheduling jobs automatical according to
>>> the "-t" time req
Hi Diego,
thanks a lot, it seems to work as far as I was able to test now.
Dietmar
On 4/30/24 3:24 PM, Diego Zuccato via slurm-users wrote:
Try adding to the config:
EnforcePartLimits=ANY
JobSubmitPlugins=all_partitions
Diego
Il 30/04/2024 15:11, Dietmar Rieder via slurm-users ha scritto:
H
Hi Loris,
On 4/30/24 3:43 PM, Loris Bennett via slurm-users wrote:
Hi Dietmar,
Dietmar Rieder via slurm-users writes:
Hi Loris,
On 4/30/24 2:53 PM, Loris Bennett via slurm-users wrote:
Hi Dietmar,
Dietmar Rieder via slurm-users
writes:
Hi,
is it possible to have slurm scheduling jobs a
Hi Dietmar,
Dietmar Rieder via slurm-users writes:
> Hi Loris,
>
> On 4/30/24 3:43 PM, Loris Bennett via slurm-users wrote:
>> Hi Dietmar,
>> Dietmar Rieder via slurm-users
>> writes:
>>
>>> Hi Loris,
>>>
>>> On 4/30/24 2:53 PM, Loris Bennett via slurm-users wrote:
Hi Dietmar,
Dietma
Hi Dietmar,
I was facing quite similar requirements to yours. We ended up using QoS
instead of partitions because this approach provides higher flexibility
and more features. The basic distinction between the two approaches is
that partitions are node-based while QoS are (essentially) resource
Dear Thomas,
the QoS seems really helpful, we'll look into it.
Perhaps as a starting point for us could you eventually translate my
simple example into a QoS config/setting?
Thanks so much
Dietmar
On 4/30/24 4:26 PM, Thomas Hartmann via slurm-users wrote:
Hi Dietmar,
I was facing quite si
Hi Loris,
On 4/30/24 4:26 PM, Loris Bennett via slurm-users wrote:
Hi Dietmar,
Dietmar Rieder via slurm-users writes:
Hi Loris,
On 4/30/24 3:43 PM, Loris Bennett via slurm-users wrote:
Hi Dietmar,
Dietmar Rieder via slurm-users
writes:
Hi Loris,
On 4/30/24 2:53 PM, Loris Bennett via sl
11 matches
Mail list logo