Ole is spot on with his federated suggestion. That is exactly what fits
the bill for you, given your requirements. You can have everything you
want, but you don't get to have it how you want (separate databases).
When/If you looked deeper into it, you will find that it addresses the
requirements
Hello,
Brian Andrus writes:
> Ole is spot on with his federated suggestion. That is exactly what fits the
> bill
> for you, given your requirements. You can have everything you want, but you
> don't get to have it how you want (separate databases).
> When/If you looked deeper into it, you will
Not wanting something is not the same as not needing it or it matters.
Personally, I don't care what color it is, if someone gave me a new
Ferrari, I would not worry about the color. Do you need to have the same
job ids among clusters? Seems that should not matter at all.
The clusters ARE whol
