Hi Chris,
On Sunday, September 23, 2018 09:34 AM, Chris Samuel wrote:
On Saturday, 22 September 2018 4:19:09 PM AEST Raymond Wan wrote:
SLURM's ability to suspend jobs must be storing the state in a
location outside of this 512 GB. So, you're not helping this by
allocating more swap.
I d
Ray
I'm also on Ubuntu. I'll try the same test, but do it with and without swap
on (e.g. by running the swapoff and swapon commands first). To complicate
things I also don't know if the swapiness level makes a difference.
Thanks
Ashton
On Sun, Sep 23, 2018, 7:48 AM Raymond Wan wrote:
>
> Hi Ch
On 24/09/18 00:46, Raymond Wan wrote:
Hmm, I'm way out of my comfort zone but I am curious about what
happens. Unfortunately, I don't think I'm able to read kernel code, but
someone here
(https://stackoverflow.com/questions/31946854/how-does-sigstop-work-in-linux-kernel)
seems to suggest
Hi Chris,
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 7:36 AM Christopher Samuel wrote:
> On 24/09/18 00:46, Raymond Wan wrote:
>
> > Hmm, I'm way out of my comfort zone but I am curious about what
> > happens. Unfortunately, I don't think I'm able to read kernel code, but
> > someone here
> > (https://stackov
