Re: [slurm-users] Suspend without gang scheduling

2022-08-08 Thread Reed Dier
Following up with a bit more specific color as to what I’m seeing, as well as a solution that I’m ashamed I didn’t come back to it. If there is exclusively tier3 work queued up, gang scheduling never comes into play. If there is tier3+tier1 work queued up, tier1 gets requeued, and tier3 preempt

[slurm-users] Suspend without gang scheduling

2022-08-08 Thread Reed Dier
I’ve got essentially 3 “tiers” of jobs. tier1 are stateless and can be requeued tier2 are stateful and can be suspended tier3 are “high priority” and can preempt tier1 and tier2 with the requisite preemption modes. > $ sacctmgr show qos format=name%10,priority%10,preempt%12,preemptmode%10 >