From: slurm-users On Behalf Of John
DeSantis
Sent: 18 May 2022 15:39
To: slurm-users@lists.schedmd.com
Subject: Re: [slurm-users] SLURM upgrade from 20.11.3 to 20.11.9
misidentification of job steps
Hello,
It also appears that random jobs are being identified as using too much memory,
d
work on Monday.
-Original Message-
From: slurm-users On Behalf Of John
DeSantis
Sent: 18 May 2022 15:39
To: slurm-users@lists.schedmd.com
Subject: Re: [slurm-users] SLURM upgrade from 20.11.3 to 20.11.9
misidentification of job steps
Hello,
It also appears that random jobs are being identified as
Hello,
It also appears that random jobs are being identified as using too much memory,
despite being well within limits.
For example, a job is running that requested 2048 MB per CPU and all processes
are within the limit. But, the job is identified as being over limit when it
isn't. Please
Hello,
Due to the recent CVE posted by Tim, we did upgrade from SLURM 20.11.3 to
20.11.9.
Today, I received a ticket from a user with their output files populated with the
"slurmstepd: error: Exceeded job memory limit" message. But, the jobs are
still running and it seems that the controller
