Re: [slurm-users] Replacement for FastSchedule since 19.05.3

2019-11-06 Thread Paul Edmon
I would submit a bug on this just to inquire as to if there is any replacement or option for FastSchedule 0.  They may have suggestions. -Paul Edmon- On 11/6/19 3:16 AM, Taras Shapovalov wrote: Hi Chris, Thanks for the answer. Does this mean that there is no way to get rid of annoying error

Re: [slurm-users] Replacement for FastSchedule since 19.05.3

2019-11-06 Thread Taras Shapovalov
Hi Chris, Thanks for the answer. Does this mean that there is no way to get rid of annoying error messages in the logs if we need the hardware autodetection (FastSchedule=0)? error: FastSchedule will be removed in 20.02, as will the FastSchedule=0 functionality. Please consider removing this from

Re: [slurm-users] Replacement for FastSchedule since 19.05.3

2019-11-05 Thread Chris Samuel
On 5/11/19 6:36 am, Taras Shapovalov wrote: Since Slurm 19.05.3 we get an error message that FastSchedule is deprecated. But I cannot find in the documentation what is an alternative option for FastSchedule=0. Do you know how we can do that without using the option since 19.05.3? There isn't

[slurm-users] Replacement for FastSchedule since 19.05.3

2019-11-05 Thread Taras Shapovalov
Hey guys, Since Slurm 19.05.3 we get an error message that FastSchedule is deprecated. But I cannot find in the documentation what is an alternative option for FastSchedule=0. Do you know how we can do that without using the option since 19.05.3? Best regards, Taras