[slurm-users] Re: Unexpected node got allocation

2025-01-09 Thread Davide DelVento via slurm-users
I believe in absence of other reasons, slurm assigns nodes to jobs in the order they are listed in the partition definitions of slurm.conf -- perhaps for whatever reason the node 41 appears first there, rather than 01? On Thu, Jan 9, 2025 at 7:24 AM Dan Healy via slurm-users < slurm-users@lists.sc

[slurm-users] Re: Unexpected node got allocation

2025-01-09 Thread Dan Healy via slurm-users
No, sadly there’s no topology.conf in use. Thanks, Daniel Healy On Thu, Jan 9, 2025 at 8:28 AM Steffen Grunewald < steffen.grunew...@aei.mpg.de> wrote: > On Thu, 2025-01-09 at 07:51:40 -0500, Slurm users wrote: > > Hello there and good morning from Baltimore. > > > > I have a small cluster wit

[slurm-users] Re: Unexpected node got allocation

2025-01-09 Thread Steffen Grunewald via slurm-users
On Thu, 2025-01-09 at 07:51:40 -0500, Slurm users wrote: > Hello there and good morning from Baltimore. > > I have a small cluster with 100 nodes. When the cluster is completely empty > of all jobs, the first job gets allocated to node 41. In other clusters, > the first job gets allocated to mode