[slurm-users] Re: Fw: Re: RHEL8.10 V slurmctld

2025-02-03 Thread Steven Jones via slurm-users
n Building, Wellington, NZ 6012 0064 4 463 6272 From: Sean Crosby via slurm-users Sent: Tuesday, 4 February 2025 12:46 pm To: slurm-users@lists.schedmd.com Subject: [slurm-users] Re: Fw: Re: RHEL8.10 V slurmctld Just double checking. Can you check on your w

[slurm-users] Re: Fw: Re: RHEL8.10 V slurmctld

2025-02-03 Thread Sean Crosby via slurm-users
slurm /etc/passwd Sean From: Steven Jones via slurm-users Sent: Tuesday, 4 February 2025 08:56 To: slurm-users@lists.schedmd.com ; Christopher Samuel Subject: [EXT] [slurm-users] Re: Fw: Re: RHEL8.10 V slurmctld External email: Please exercise ca

[slurm-users] Re: Fw: Re: RHEL8.10 V slurmctld

2025-02-03 Thread Steven Jones via slurm-users
n try. regards Steven From: Christopher Samuel via slurm-users Sent: Tuesday, 4 February 2025 10:13 am To: slurm-users@lists.schedmd.com Subject: [slurm-users] Re: Fw: Re: RHEL8.10 V slurmctld On 2/3/25 2:33 pm, Steven Jones via slurm-users wrote: > Just

[slurm-users] Re: Fw: Re: RHEL8.10 V slurmctld

2025-02-03 Thread Christopher Samuel via slurm-users
On 2/3/25 2:33 pm, Steven Jones via slurm-users wrote: Just built 4 x rocky9 nodes and I do not get that error (but I get another I know how to fix, I think) so holistically  I am thinking the version difference is too large. Oh I think I missed this - when you say version difference do you m

[slurm-users] Re: Fw: Re: RHEL8.10 V slurmctld

2025-02-03 Thread Renfro, Michael via slurm-users
is small enough to where we’ve never had a load or other performance issue with our AD. From: Steven Jones Date: Monday, February 3, 2025 at 2:14 PM To: Renfro, Michael , slurm-users@lists.schedmd.com , Chris Samuel Subject: Re: [slurm-users] Re: Fw: Re: RHEL8.10 V slurmctld External Email

[slurm-users] Re: Fw: Re: RHEL8.10 V slurmctld

2025-02-03 Thread Steven Jones via slurm-users
regards Steven From: Renfro, Michael Sent: Tuesday, 4 February 2025 8:51 am To: Steven Jones ; slurm-users@lists.schedmd.com ; Chris Samuel Subject: Re: [slurm-users] Re: Fw: Re: RHEL8.10 V slurmctld You don't often get email from ren...@tntech.edu. Learn why this

[slurm-users] Re: Fw: Re: RHEL8.10 V slurmctld

2025-02-03 Thread Renfro, Michael via slurm-users
@lists.schedmd.com , Chris Samuel Subject: [slurm-users] Re: Fw: Re: RHEL8.10 V slurmctld External Email Warning This email originated from outside the university. Please use caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding to requests. Hi, I have never

[slurm-users] Re: Fw: Re: RHEL8.10 V slurmctld

2025-02-03 Thread Steven Jones via slurm-users
-users Sent: Monday, 3 February 2025 1:44 pm To: slurm-users@lists.schedmd.com Subject: [slurm-users] Re: Fw: Re: RHEL8.10 V slurmctld On 2/2/25 4:18 pm, Steven Jones via slurm-users wrote: > isn't it slurmd on the compute nodes? It is, but as this check is (I think) happening on the comput

[slurm-users] Re: Fw: Re: RHEL8.10 V slurmctld

2025-02-02 Thread Chris Samuel via slurm-users
On 2/2/25 4:18 pm, Steven Jones via slurm-users wrote: isn't it slurmd on the compute nodes? It is, but as this check is (I think) happening on the compute node I was wanting to check who slurmctld was running as. The only other thought I have is what is in the compute nodes slurm.conf as

[slurm-users] Re: Fw: Re: RHEL8.10 V slurmctld

2025-02-02 Thread Steven Jones via slurm-users
Chris Samuel via slurm-users Sent: Monday, 3 February 2025 12:52 pm To: slurm-users@lists.schedmd.com Subject: [slurm-users] Re: Fw: Re: RHEL8.10 V slurmctld On 2/2/25 3:46 pm, Steven Jones wrote: > I have never done a HPC before, it is all new to me so I can be making > "newbie errors

[slurm-users] Re: Fw: Re: RHEL8.10 V slurmctld

2025-02-02 Thread Chris Samuel via slurm-users
On 2/2/25 3:46 pm, Steven Jones wrote: I have never done a HPC before, it is all new to me so I can be making "newbie errors".   The old HPC has been dumped on us so I am trying to build it "professionally" shall we say  ie documented, stable and I will train ppl to build it  (all this with no

[slurm-users] Re: Fw: Re: RHEL8.10 V slurmctld

2025-02-02 Thread Steven Jones via slurm-users
Steven From: Chris Samuel via slurm-users Sent: Monday, 3 February 2025 11:59 am To: slurm-users@lists.schedmd.com Subject: [slurm-users] Re: Fw: Re: RHEL8.10 V slurmctld On 2/2/25 2:46 pm, Steven Jones via slurm-users wrote: > [2025-01-30T19:45:29.024]

[slurm-users] Re: Fw: Re: RHEL8.10 V slurmctld

2025-02-02 Thread Chris Samuel via slurm-users
On 2/2/25 2:46 pm, Steven Jones via slurm-users wrote: [2025-01-30T19:45:29.024] error: Security violation, ping RPC from uid 12002 Looking at the code that seems to come from this code: if (!_slurm_authorized_user(msg->auth_uid)) { error("Security violation, batch lau

[slurm-users] Re: Fw: Re: RHEL8.10 V slurmctld

2025-02-02 Thread Steven Jones via slurm-users
doh, I was looking in /var/log/slurm/ and not /var/log/ I can try running a job again to get a fresh log? regards Steven From: Chris Samuel via slurm-users Sent: Monday, 3 February 2025 11:28 am To: slurm-users@lists.schedmd.com Subject: [slurm-u

[slurm-users] Re: Fw: Re: RHEL8.10 V slurmctld

2025-02-02 Thread Chris Samuel via slurm-users
On 2/2/25 1:54 pm, Steven Jones via slurm-users wrote: Thanks for the reply.  I already went through this 🙁.  I checked all nodes, id works as does a ssh login. What is in your slurmd logs on that node? -- slurm-users mailing list -- slurm-users@lists.schedmd.com To unsubscribe send an email