Re: [slurm-users] Dependencies with singleton and after

: Slurm User Community List Subject: Re: [slurm-users] Dependencies with singleton and after Attention : courriel externe | external email just curious. if you leave out the singleton, do you get the behavior as expected? On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 9:42 AM Jarno van der Kolk wrote: > >

Re: [slurm-users] Dependencies with singleton and after

just curious. if you leave out the singleton, do you get the behavior as expected? On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 9:42 AM Jarno van der Kolk wrote: > > Hi all, > > I'm still puzzled by the expected behaviour of the following: > $ sbatch --hold fakejob.sh > Submitted batch job 25909273 > $ sbatch --hold

Re: [slurm-users] Dependencies with singleton and after

Hi all, I'm still puzzled by the expected behaviour of the following: $ sbatch --hold fakejob.sh Submitted batch job 25909273 $ sbatch --hold fakejob.sh Submitted batch job 25909274 $ sbatch --hold fakejob.sh Submitted batch job 25909275 $ scontrol update jobid=25909273 Dependency=singleton $ scon

Re: [slurm-users] Dependencies with singleton and after

ct: Re: [slurm-users] Dependencies with singleton and after   Hmm. I've actually never used singleton and merely chained dependencies. Maybe you can do that as a workaround: waitjob=$(sbatch --hold fakejob.sh |sed 's/Submitted batch job //') for i in {1..2}; do   echo Submitting $VAUL

Re: [slurm-users] Dependencies with singleton and after

ists.schedmd.com Subject: Re: [slurm-users] Dependencies with singleton and after Have you tried adding the dependency at submit time? sbatch --dependency=singleton fakejob.sh Brian Andrus On 8/21/2019 1:51 PM, Jarno van der Kolk wrote: Hi, I am helping a researcher who encountered an

Re: [slurm-users] Dependencies with singleton and after

: slurm-users@lists.schedmd.com Subject: Re: [slurm-users] Dependencies with singleton and after Have you tried adding the dependency at submit time? sbatch --dependency=singleton fakejob.sh Brian Andrus On 8/21/2019 1:51 PM, Jarno van der Kolk wrote: > Hi, > > I am helping a resea

Re: [slurm-users] Dependencies with singleton and after

> From: Kevin Buckley > Sent: August 22, 2019 3:33 AM > To: slurm-users@lists.schedmd.com > Cc: Jarno van der Kolk > Subject: Re: [slurm-users] Dependencies with singleton and after > > On 2019/08/22 04:51, Jarno van der Kolk wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I am

Re: [slurm-users] Dependencies with singleton and after

On 2019/08/22 04:51, Jarno van der Kolk wrote: Hi, I am helping a researcher who encountered an unexpected behaviour with dependencies. He uses both "singleton" and "after". The minimal working example is as follows: $ sbatch --hold fakejob.sh Submitted batch job 25909273 $ sbatch --hold fakej

Re: [slurm-users] Dependencies with singleton and after

Have you tried adding the dependency at submit time? sbatch --dependency=singleton fakejob.sh Brian Andrus On 8/21/2019 1:51 PM, Jarno van der Kolk wrote: Hi, I am helping a researcher who encountered an unexpected behaviour with dependencies. He uses both "singleton" and "after". The minim

[slurm-users] Dependencies with singleton and after

Hi, I am helping a researcher who encountered an unexpected behaviour with dependencies. He uses both "singleton" and "after". The minimal working example is as follows: $ sbatch --hold fakejob.sh Submitted batch job 25909273 $ sbatch --hold fakejob.sh Submitted batch job 25909274 $ sbatch --ho