Re: [slurm-users] Correct way to do logrotation

2023-10-17 Thread Timony, Mick
of Davide DelVento Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2023 10:26 AM To: Slurm User Community List Subject: Re: [slurm-users] Correct way to do logrotation I'd be interested in this too, and I'm reposting only because the message was flagged as both "dangerous email" and "sp

Re: [slurm-users] Correct way to do logrotation

2023-10-17 Thread Groner, Rob
lurm-users] Correct way to do logrotation I'd be interested in this too, and I'm reposting only because the message was flagged as both "dangerous email" and "spam", so people may not have seen it (hopefully my reply will not suffer the same downfall...) On Mon,

Re: [slurm-users] Correct way to do logrotation

2023-10-17 Thread Davide DelVento
I'd be interested in this too, and I'm reposting only because the message was flagged as both "dangerous email" and "spam", so people may not have seen it (hopefully my reply will not suffer the same downfall...) On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 3:26 AM Taras Shapovalov wrote: > Hello, > > In the past it

[slurm-users] Correct way to do logrotation

2023-10-16 Thread Taras Shapovalov
Hello, In the past it was recommended to reconfigure slurm daemons in logrotate script, sending a signal I believe was also the way to go. But recently I retested manual logrotation and I see that a removal of log file (for slurmctld, slurmdbd or slurmd) does not affect the logging of the daemo