Re: [slurm-users] Ubuntu20.04 - DRAIN state with SMT in node capabilities

2021-11-24 Thread Sven Duscha
Dear all, a small update. On 24.11.21 18:13, Sven Duscha wrote: So, maybe this wouldn't be a big disadvantage, if that allows us to use 32 slots on the "16 Cores with 2 SMT" Xeons in the PowerEdge R720 machines with Ubuntu 20.04 Has anyone else encountered this problem? Is

[slurm-users] Ubuntu20.03 - DRAIN state with SMT in node capabilities

2021-11-24 Thread Sven Duscha
s to use 32 slots on the "16 Cores with 2 SMT" Xeons in the PowerEdge R720 machines with Ubuntu 20.04 Has anyone else encountered this problem? Is there a better/proper for using all SMT/HT cores? Best regards, Sven Duscha -- Sven Duscha Deutsches Herzzentrum München Tech

Re: [slurm-users] SLURM slurmctld error on Ubuntu20.04 starting through systemctl

2021-03-18 Thread Sven Duscha
quot; the problem. I could live with that, even though I try to adhere to strict permission management. That also doesn't work Mar 18 12:46:33 slurm systemd[1]: slurmctld.service: Can't open PID file /run/slurm-lnll/slurmctld.pid (yet?) after start: Operation not permitted Mar

Re: [slurm-users] SLURM slurmctld error on Ubuntu20.04 starting through systemctl

2021-03-17 Thread Sven Duscha
ething obvious here. Rodrigo's suggestion to use /var/run/slurm-llnl works with "systemctl start slurmctld" for me, even though it has the same permissions: ls -lthrd /var/run/slurm-lnll/ drwxrwxr-x 2 root slurm 60 Mar 17 20:50 /var/run/slurm-lnll/ Best wishes, Sven -- Sven

[slurm-users] SLURM slurmctld error on Ubuntu20.04 starting through systemctl

2021-03-17 Thread Sven Duscha
urm systemd[1]: Stopped Slurm controller daemon. I am a little astonished that the default package shows this strange behaviour regarding slurmctld installed through the package manager. The base installation is Ubuntu 20.04 server installation, where I did no modifications apart from inst