Re: [slurm-users] Unexpected negative NICE values

sh pending jobs ahead of normal (also other user's) jobs in the queue, if only one of their jobs has already a negative nice value assigned, e.g. by an administrator. Best regards Jürgen * Sebastian Potthoff [230503 10:36]: Hello all, I am encountering some unexpected behavior where the jo

[slurm-users] Unexpected negative NICE values

Hello all, I am encountering some unexpected behavior where the jobs (queued & running) of one specific user have negative NICE values and therefore an increased priority. The user is not privileged in any way and cannot explicitly set the nice value to a negative value by e.g. adding "--nice

Re: [slurm-users] Providing users with info on wait time vs. run time

> used (submitted jobs per hour)? > > We have around 190 32-core nodes. I don't know how I would easily find > out the average number of jobs per hour. The only problems we have had > with submission have been when people have written their own mechanisms > for submittin

Re: [slurm-users] Providing users with info on wait time vs. run time

don’t have to worry about ownership of the output file. Sebastian > Am 16.09.2022 um 09:09 schrieb Loris Bennett : > > Hi Hermann, > > Sebastian Potthoff <mailto:s.potth...@uni-muenster.de>> writes: > >> Hi Hermann, >> >> I happened to read alon

Re: [slurm-users] Providing users with info on wait time vs. run time

with its recommendations! Will definitely look into it. -- Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität (WWU) Münster WWU IT Sebastian Potthoff (eScience / HPC) > Am 15.09.2022 um 18:07 schrieb Hermann Schwärzler > : > > Hi Ole, > > On 9/15/22 5:21 PM, Ole Holm Nielsen wrote: >> O

Re: [slurm-users] Strange behaviour with dynamically linked binary in batch job

therefore always finding the correct MPI libs. Kind regards Sebastian > Am 30.03.2022 um 18:08 schrieb Sebastian Potthoff > : > > Hi Noam, > > Thanks for your suggestion - I already did this and confirmed the modules and > LD_LIBARARY_PATH are set correctly. Also if ther

Re: [slurm-users] Strange behaviour with dynamically linked binary in batch job

Hi Noam, Thanks for your suggestion - I already did this and confirmed the modules and LD_LIBARARY_PATH are set correctly. Also if there was something wrong here, all of this would not work with self-compiled binaries, which it does… which baffles me :-/ > Am 30.03.2022 um 17:51 schrieb Berns

[slurm-users] Strange behaviour with dynamically linked binary in batch job

Hi all, I am observing some strange behaviour with a dynamically linked binary inside an sbatch job. This binary is, among others, compiled against the MPICH library - so when I do an „ldd“ I get $ ldd /path/to/binary linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x7ffd817c5000) libdl.so.2 => /lib