[slurm-users] Re: Reserving resources for use by non-slurm stuff

2024-04-17 Thread Paul Raines via slurm-users
On a single Rocky8 workstation with one GPU where we wanted ssh interactive logins to it to have a small portion of its resources (shell, compiling, simple data manipulations, console desktop, etc) and the rest for SLURM we did this: - Set it to use cgroupv2 * modify /etc/defaultg/grub to

[slurm-users] Re: Reserving resources for use by non-slurm stuff

2024-04-17 Thread Sean Maxwell via slurm-users
Hi Shooktija, On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 7:45 AM Shooktija S N via slurm-users < slurm-users@lists.schedmd.com> wrote: > NodeName=server[1-3] RealMemory=128636 Sockets=1 CoresPerSocket=64 > ThreadsPerCore=2 State=UNKNOWN Gres=gpu:1 > PartitionName=mainPartition Nodes=ALL Default=YES MaxTime=INFINITE

[slurm-users] Inconsistencies in CPU time Reporting by sreport and sacct Tools

2024-04-17 Thread KK via slurm-users
I wish to ascertain the CPU core time utilized by user dj1 and dj. I have tested with sreport cluster UserUtilizationByAccount, sreport job SizesByAccount, and sacct. It appears that sreport cluster UserUtilizationByAccount displays the total core hours used by the entire account, rather than the i

[slurm-users] Reserving resources for use by non-slurm stuff

2024-04-17 Thread Shooktija S N via slurm-users
Hi, I am running Slurm (v22.05.8) on 3 nodes each with the following specs: OS: Proxmox VE 8.1.4 x86_64 (based on Debian 12) CPU: AMD EPYC 7662 (128) GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Memory: 128 Gb This is /etc/slurm/slurm.conf on all 3 computers without the comment lines: ClusterName=DlabCluster S

[slurm-users] Association limit problem

2024-04-17 Thread Gestió Servidors via slurm-users
Hello, I'm doing some test with "associations" with "sacctmgr". I have created three users (user_1, user_2 and user_3). For each of these users, I have created an association: [root@myserver log]# sacctmgr show user user_1 --associations User Def Acct AdminClusterAccount Pa

[slurm-users] Re: Munge log-file fills up the file system to 100%

2024-04-17 Thread Bjørn-Helge Mevik via slurm-users
Jeffrey T Frey via slurm-users writes: >> AFAIK, the fs.file-max limit is a node-wide limit, whereas "ulimit -n" >> is per user. > > The ulimit is a frontend to rusage limits, which are per-process restrictions > (not per-user). You are right; I sit corrected. :) (Except for number of procs an