Those CVEs are indeed for different software (one for PMIx, one for
Slurm), even though they're ultimately for the same kind of underlying
problem (chown() being used instead of lchown(), which could lead in
taking over privileged files).
The Slurm patches include more fixes related to permissions
On 10/16/23 08:22, Groner, Rob wrote:
It is my understanding that it is a different issue than pmix.
That's my understanding too. The PMIx issue wasn't in Slurm, it was in
the PMIx code that Slurm was linked to. This CVE is for Slurm itself.
--
Chris Samuel : http://www.csamuel.org/ : B
Hi Angel and Loris,
I hope this will be of at least some help, as I was tasked with trying to get
site factor implemented in our cluster for the sake of making conformant,
predictable priority values that were “pretty” and round, and I was not able to
find any good documentation for it either.
It is my understanding that it is a different issue than pmix. So to be fully
protected, you would need to build the latest/fixed pmix and rebuild slurm
using that (or just keep pmix disabled), AND have this latest version of slurm
with their fix for their own vulnerability.
Rob
_
Try
scontrol update NodeName=heimdall state=DOWN Reason="gpu issue"
and then
scontrol update NodeName=heimdall state=RESUME
to see if it will work. Probably just SLURM daemon having a hiccup
after you made changes.
Best,
Feng
On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 10:43 AM Gregor Hagelueken
wrote:
>
> Hi,
Hi,
We have a ubuntu server (22.04) with currently 5 GPUs (1 x l40 and 4 x
rtx_a5000).
I am trying to configure slurm such that a user can select either the l40 or
a5000 gpus for a particular job.
I have configured my slurm.conf and gres.conf files similar as in this old
thread:
https://groups.
Hello,
In the past it was recommended to reconfigure slurm daemons in logrotate
script, sending a signal I believe was also the way to go. But recently I
retested manual logrotation and I see that a removal of log file (for
slurmctld, slurmdbd or slurmd) does not affect the logging of the daemo
