Re: [slurm-users] Limit run time of interactive jobs

2023-05-08 Thread Angel de Vicente
Hello, Bjørn-Helge Mevik writes: >> A solution was suggested in >> https://serverfault.com/questions/1090689/how-can-i-set-up-interactive-job-only-or-batch-job-only-partition-on-a-slurm-clu >>> Interactive jobs have no script and job_desc.script will be empty / >> not set. >> >> So maybe somethi

Re: [slurm-users] Best way to accurately calculate the CPU usage of an account when using fairshare?

2023-05-08 Thread Paul Edmon
I would recommend standing up an instance of XDMod as it handles most of this for you in its summary reports. https://open.xdmod.org/10.0/index.html -Paul Edmon- On 5/3/23 2:05 PM, Joseph Francisco Guzman wrote: Good morning, We have at least one billed account right now, where the associ

Re: [slurm-users] Limit run time of interactive jobs

2023-05-08 Thread Bjørn-Helge Mevik
Ole Holm Nielsen writes: > On 5/8/23 08:39, Bjørn-Helge Mevik wrote: >> Angel de Vicente writes: >> >>> But one possible way to something similar is to have a partition only >>> for interactive jobs and a different partition for batch jobs, and then >>> enforce that each job uses the right part

Re: [slurm-users] Limit run time of interactive jobs

2023-05-08 Thread Ole Holm Nielsen
On 5/8/23 08:39, Bjørn-Helge Mevik wrote: Angel de Vicente writes: But one possible way to something similar is to have a partition only for interactive jobs and a different partition for batch jobs, and then enforce that each job uses the right partition. In order to do this, I think we can u

[slurm-users] New future and roadmap for Slurm-web

2023-05-08 Thread Rémi Palancher
Hi Slurm community, Slurm-web is an open source web interface for Slurm workload manager : http://rackslab.github.io/slurm-web/ The project was born in 2015(*), it was originally funded by EDF [2] (huge thanks to them!) and it reached a nice and unique feature set with versions 2.x. Unfortunat

Re: [slurm-users] Limit run time of interactive jobs

2023-05-08 Thread Angel de Vicente
Hi, Bjørn-Helge Mevik writes: > Wouldn't it be simpler to just refuse too long interactive jobs in > job_submit.lua? Yes, I guess. I proposed the idea of having different partitions because then the constraints are at the level of the partition, which is probably easier to handle than modifying