Re: [slurm-users] job requesting licenses would not be scheduled as expected

2022-03-15 Thread Williams, Gareth (IM&T, Black Mountain)
This is what I would expect. It doesn't matter that the 7 license job has higher priority as it in ineligible to run due to the lack of licenses. The scheduler moves on and prioritises (and starts) the next eligible job. I will suggest a workaround. You could periodically run a script that look

Re: [slurm-users] job requesting licenses would not be scheduled as expected

2022-03-15 Thread Brian Andrus
Depending on other variables, it is fine. The 7 license job cannot run because there are only 5 available, so that one has to wait. Since there are 5 available, the 1 license job can run, so it does. That is the simple view. Other variables such as job time could affect that. Brian Andrus On

[slurm-users] The 8 second default for sbatch's --get-user-env: is it "the only default"

2022-03-15 Thread Kevin Buckley
We have a group of users who occasionally report seeing jobs start without, for example, $HOME being set. Looking at the slurmd logs (info level) on our 20.11.8 node, shows the first instance of an afflicted JobID appearing as [2022-03-11T00:19:35.117] task/affinity: task_p_slurmd_batch_request: