Re: [slurm-users] Store sstat information permanently on job completion?

2019-10-30 Thread Brian Andrus
Except sstat can give you the MaxRSS without having cgroups and it will give you a simple MaxRSS, whereas sacct provides a MaxRSS for every step... have to play with that data to get the high water mark grrr. I had tried to use sstat in an epilogue but apparently that is too late... Brian

Re: [slurm-users] RHEL8 support

2019-10-30 Thread Brian Andrus
Lol. Sure. All I did was require python3 and install it. (I prefer python3 to python2 just because...) You could probably do it with python2 if you prefer -- 65c65 < BuildRequires: python --- > BuildRequires: python3 - So, a few new things I had to do: yum config-ma

Re: [slurm-users] Store sstat information permanently on job completion?

2019-10-30 Thread Jacob Chappell
Ah! I didn't realize sacct included that data, but I see the fields listed now. Thanks! __ *Jacob D. Chappell, CSM* *Research Computing Associate* Research Computing | Research Computing Infrastructure Information Technology Services | University of

Re: [slurm-users] Store sstat information permanently on job completion?

2019-10-30 Thread Paul Edmon
All the aggregate historic data should be accessible via sacct. sstat is for live jobs but sacct is for completed jobs. -Paul Edmon- On 10/30/2019 2:13 PM, Jacob Chappell wrote: Is there a simple way to store sstat information permanently on job completion? We already have job accounting on, b

Re: [slurm-users] RHEL8 support

2019-10-30 Thread Christopher Benjamin Coffey
Yes, I'd be interested too. Best, Chris -- Christopher Coffey High-Performance Computing Northern Arizona University 928-523-1167 On 10/30/19, 3:54 AM, "slurm-users on behalf of Andy Georges" wrote: Hi Brian, On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 10:42:59AM -0700, Brian Andrus wrote:

[slurm-users] Store sstat information permanently on job completion?

2019-10-30 Thread Jacob Chappell
Is there a simple way to store sstat information permanently on job completion? We already have job accounting on, but the information collected from cgroups doesn't seem to be stored once a job finishes (sstat -j $JOB_ID on a dead job returns an error). Thanks, ___

Re: [slurm-users] can't get fairshare to be calculated per partition

2019-10-30 Thread Ryan Cox
Fairshare is calculated based on an "association".  If you look in the manpage for sacctmgr under ENTITIES, you will see:    association   The  entity  used  to  group information consisting of four parameters: account, cluster, partition (optional), and user. Users can have en

Re: [slurm-users] Preemption Priority

2019-10-30 Thread Oytun Peksel
Hi Thanks for your reply. I enabled both of them but still the oldest job gets suspended. Here is my slurm.conf if you can see something I can't. 0 MpiDefault=none 1 ProctrackType=proctrack/linuxproc 2 ReturnToService=1 3 SlurmctldPidFile=/var/run/slurmctld.pid 4 SlurmdPidFile=/var/run

Re: [slurm-users] can't get fairshare to be calculated per partition

2019-10-30 Thread Igor Feghali
Makes sense but in case I can guarantee no job will ever request more than one partition isn’t there any work around to get fairshare calculated per partition ? Em ter, 29 de out de 2019 às 18:34, Christopher Samuel escreveu: > On 10/29/19 12:42 PM, Igor Feghali wrote: > > > fairshare is been ca

Re: [slurm-users] RHEL8 support

2019-10-30 Thread Andy Georges
Hi Brian, On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 10:42:59AM -0700, Brian Andrus wrote: > Ok, I had been planning on getting around to it, so this prompted me to do > so. > > Yes, I can get slurm 19.05.3 to build (and package) under CentOS 8. > > There are some caveats, however since many repositories and package